Tools & Wizards About Us
comparecellular.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

comparecellular.com

Home Page - CompareCellular.com

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

195 ms

comparecellular.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to comparecellular.com homepage info - get ready to check Compare Cellular best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about comparecellular.com

Stop overpaying for cell service. Compare cell phone plans, coverage and pricing across 30+ carriers and find the one that's best for you.

Visit comparecellular.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparecellular.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparecellular.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparecellular.com

90 ms

www.comparecellular.com

1133 ms

v5home.css

118 ms

brand

17 ms

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Comparecellular.com, 26% (15 requests) were made to Images.comparecellular.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Comparecellular.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.1 kB (31%)

Content Size

310.9 kB

After Optimization

215.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparecellular.com main page is 310.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 141.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 22.9 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 129.5 kB
  • After minification 108.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Compare Cellular needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 141.0 kB
  • After minification 139.5 kB
  • After compression 98.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparecellular.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (32%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Cellular. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparecellular.com

comparecellular.com

90 ms

www.comparecellular.com

www.comparecellular.com

1133 ms

v5home.css

v5home.css

118 ms

brand

brand

17 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

brand

brand

65 ms

css

css

61 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

68 ms

Flag_of_US.jpg

Flag_of_US.jpg

67 ms

Samsung-Galaxy-S7-edge-thumb.jpg

Samsung-Galaxy-S7-edge-thumb.jpg

920 ms

Samsung-Galaxy-S7-thumb.jpg

Samsung-Galaxy-S7-thumb.jpg

919 ms

LG-K7-thumb.jpg

LG-K7-thumb.jpg

931 ms

Sonim-XP7-IS-thumb.jpg

Sonim-XP7-IS-thumb.jpg

922 ms

Kyocera-DuraXTP-thumb.jpg

Kyocera-DuraXTP-thumb.jpg

926 ms

ZTE-Avid-Plus-thumb.jpg

ZTE-Avid-Plus-thumb.jpg

917 ms

LG-Optimus-Zone-3-thumb.jpg

LG-Optimus-Zone-3-thumb.jpg

955 ms

Kyocera-Hydro-View-thumb.jpg

Kyocera-Hydro-View-thumb.jpg

961 ms

Kyocera-DuraXE-thumb.jpg

Kyocera-DuraXE-thumb.jpg

953 ms

Apple-iPhone-6s-thumb.jpg

Apple-iPhone-6s-thumb.jpg

956 ms

Apple-iPhone-6-thumb.jpg

Apple-iPhone-6-thumb.jpg

961 ms

Samsung-Galaxy-S6-thumb.jpg

Samsung-Galaxy-S6-thumb.jpg

964 ms

Nexus-6P-thumb.jpg

Nexus-6P-thumb.jpg

990 ms

BlackBerry-Priv-thumb.jpg

BlackBerry-Priv-thumb.jpg

992 ms

Alcatel-OneTouch-Pop-Icon-thumb.jpg

Alcatel-OneTouch-Pop-Icon-thumb.jpg

992 ms

Flag_of_Canada.jpg

Flag_of_Canada.jpg

52 ms

compare-cellular-logo.jpg

compare-cellular-logo.jpg

129 ms

use-our-tool.png

use-our-tool.png

172 ms

google-grey.png

google-grey.png

123 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

127 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

128 ms

ca-pub-5882190016564245.js

ca-pub-5882190016564245.js

115 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

115 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

57 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

65 ms

ads

ads

357 ms

osd.js

osd.js

42 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

ads

ads

295 ms

ads

ads

308 ms

25706-185705-36959-92

25706-185705-36959-92

99 ms

abg.js

abg.js

35 ms

css

css

16 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

36 ms

favicon

favicon

101 ms

s

s

32 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

103 ms

favicon

favicon

114 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

25 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

25 ms

IMM_StraightTalk_01072016_MF_Display_Q1-16_Test_Free_LG-Optimus-Dynamic-Refurb_v1a_ST00962_728x90.jpg

IMM_StraightTalk_01072016_MF_Display_Q1-16_Test_Free_LG-Optimus-Dynamic-Refurb_v1a_ST00962_728x90.jpg

106 ms

inv_a.js

inv_a.js

51 ms

augur.min.js

augur.min.js

102 ms

7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js

7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js

5 ms

PuwvqkdbcqU-fCZ9Ed-b7S3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

PuwvqkdbcqU-fCZ9Ed-b7S3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

14 ms

_.htm

_.htm

26 ms

img.gif

img.gif

3 ms

Accessibility Review

comparecellular.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

comparecellular.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

comparecellular.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparecellular.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparecellular.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparecellular.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Cellular. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: