5.2 sec in total
271 ms
4 sec
936 ms
Click here to check amazing Compare Cheap Flight content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about comparecheapflight.com
CompareCheapFlight.com:CompareCheapFlight.com was Founded in 2022. Our mission at CompareCheapFlightis to let you discover the world at the cheapest cost,our flight’s search system lets you compare ov...
Visit comparecheapflight.comWe analyzed Comparecheapflight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
comparecheapflight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value4,170 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.516
15/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
271 ms
740 ms
114 ms
213 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Comparecheapflight.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Comparecheapflight.com.
Page size can be reduced by 359.9 kB (21%)
1.7 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Comparecheapflight.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Cheap Flight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 148.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.4 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparecheapflight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (68%)
73
23
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Cheap Flight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparecheapflight.com
271 ms
comparecheapflight.com
740 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
114 ms
style.min.css
213 ms
style-index.css
284 ms
styles.css
304 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
293 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
295 ms
css
54 ms
animate.min.css
318 ms
font-awesome.min.css
315 ms
bootstrap.min.css
441 ms
flexslider.css
374 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
379 ms
jquery.timepicker.css
379 ms
style-purple.min.css
792 ms
custom.css
419 ms
responsive.min.css
458 ms
default.min.css
464 ms
js_composer.min.css
724 ms
18.ad88a95553067fcfaab5.css
529 ms
jquery.min.js
685 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
544 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
551 ms
cookie-law-info-ccpa.js
642 ms
js
102 ms
adsbygoogle.js
116 ms
content
318 ms
scripts_en.js
355 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
627 ms
rs6.css
783 ms
index.js
782 ms
index.js
901 ms
rbtools.min.js
1027 ms
rs6.min.js
1107 ms
core.min.js
997 ms
datepicker.min.js
998 ms
mouse.min.js
999 ms
slider.min.js
1000 ms
plugin.js
1000 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1019 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1027 ms
js
77 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1027 ms
jquery.timepicker.js
1040 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
921 ms
theme-scripts.js
862 ms
gmap3.min.js
853 ms
gmap3.infobox.js
913 ms
map.js
908 ms
comment-reply.min.js
883 ms
runtime.530be0de12661bb898c6.js
884 ms
loader.1c5e7f2174638cc0d77c.js
824 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
900 ms
logo2906.png
378 ms
mobile-menu.png
370 ms
destinations01.jpg
783 ms
download-1.jpeg
377 ms
destinations03.jpg
620 ms
destinations04.jpg
780 ms
places02.jpg
786 ms
places01.jpg
782 ms
places03.jpg
784 ms
125.png
782 ms
215.png
843 ms
315.png
838 ms
47.png
820 ms
54.png
833 ms
64.png
826 ms
parallax-bg1.jpg
1034 ms
analytics.js
119 ms
js
117 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
356 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
343 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
510 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
528 ms
soap-icons.woff
655 ms
collect
211 ms
sky3.png
1014 ms
mountain.png
432 ms
car.png
196 ms
gen_204
98 ms
comparecheapflight.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
comparecheapflight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
comparecheapflight.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparecheapflight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparecheapflight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comparecheapflight.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Cheap Flight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: