1.2 sec in total
150 ms
910 ms
165 ms
Visit comparecompanies.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Compare Companies content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparecompanies.co.uk
Find a tradesman with Compare Companies and get the best home improvement prices available. We match you with local home improvement contractors where possible.
Visit comparecompanies.co.ukWe analyzed Comparecompanies.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
comparecompanies.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value1,140 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.118
85/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
150 ms
19 ms
32 ms
33 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Comparecompanies.co.uk, 5% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 3% (1 request) were made to S.trustpilot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparecompanies.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 112.6 kB (22%)
523.5 kB
411.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparecompanies.co.uk main page is 523.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 388.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Companies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 64.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparecompanies.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (8%)
36
33
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Companies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparecompanies.co.uk
150 ms
style1.css
19 ms
font.css
32 ms
form.css
33 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
71 ms
styleform.js
34 ms
tp_elements_all.js
48 ms
sdk.js
48 ms
logo.png
32 ms
navistrip.png
30 ms
phoneicon.png
32 ms
mainbannerbg.png
102 ms
btn1.png
32 ms
optionimg.png
618 ms
backbtn.png
38 ms
circleicon.png
38 ms
arrowlink.png
39 ms
girlimg.png
71 ms
btn2.png
47 ms
staricon.png
69 ms
newsicon.png
83 ms
captcha.php
88 ms
icon_refresh.png
85 ms
btn3.png
86 ms
footertopbg.png
88 ms
client1.png
116 ms
client2.png
102 ms
client3.png
117 ms
client4.png
108 ms
client5.png
113 ms
fbicon.png
119 ms
twittericon.png
121 ms
likeinicon.png
129 ms
googleplusicon.png
132 ms
cabin-regular-webfont.woff
148 ms
cabin-italic-webfont.woff
136 ms
cabin-bold-webfont.woff
154 ms
180 ms
xd_arbiter.php
44 ms
xd_arbiter.php
69 ms
comparecompanies.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
comparecompanies.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
comparecompanies.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparecompanies.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Comparecompanies.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comparecompanies.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Companies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: