767 ms in total
20 ms
533 ms
214 ms
Click here to check amazing Comparethehosts content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about comparethehosts.com
We tested out 15 web hosting providers & compared them based on price, performance, features, support. 12 months real-time data.
Visit comparethehosts.comWe analyzed Comparethehosts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 747 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
comparethehosts.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.466
19/100
15%
Value4.3 s
84/100
10%
20 ms
100 ms
48 ms
46 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Comparethehosts.com, 53% (18 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 24% (8 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (340 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 83.1 kB (43%)
192.1 kB
109.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparethehosts.com main page is 192.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 111.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comparethehosts images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparethehosts.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (88%)
32
4
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparethehosts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparethehosts.com
20 ms
comparethehosts.com
100 ms
uxcore2.min.css
48 ms
noheader.min.css
46 ms
c9302e26756e1a9a.css
25 ms
f3d7d266c35baf54.css
39 ms
8210b14763457e23.css
42 ms
polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js
43 ms
853.7d7067fffa72ef90.js
80 ms
webpack-008ffa3c98fc8544.js
80 ms
main-999f8182f179b553.js
85 ms
framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js
87 ms
_app-74cd4fb80f14b27b.js
149 ms
670-e807ace496afef9f.js
85 ms
584-84fd276034ffe4bd.js
147 ms
787-b8887dd5c5d965da.js
158 ms
%5Bdomain%5D-0c2aac4ebf4cce77.js
145 ms
_buildManifest.js
155 ms
_ssgManifest.js
149 ms
_middlewareManifest.js
148 ms
polyfill.min.js
82 ms
uxcore2.min.js
78 ms
vendor~uxcore2.min.js
77 ms
heartbeat.js
73 ms
noheader.min.js
77 ms
aksb.min.js
115 ms
image
340 ms
utag.js
117 ms
gtm.js
51 ms
utag.7.js
68 ms
tcc.min.js
16 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
utag.v.js
36 ms
collect
4 ms
comparethehosts.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
comparethehosts.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
comparethehosts.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparethehosts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparethehosts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comparethehosts.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparethehosts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: