42.9 sec in total
929 ms
27.5 sec
14.5 sec
Visit coship.com now to see the best up-to-date Coship content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about coship.com
同洲电子拥有500人数字视讯开发团队,在数字视讯领域,拥有近2000项专利,其中一半为发明专利,建立行业首家企业博士后科研工作站,建立三网融合多媒体交互技术国家地方联合工程实验室。
Visit coship.comWe analyzed Coship.com page load time and found that the first response time was 929 ms and then it took 42 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
coship.com performance score
929 ms
10736 ms
940 ms
586 ms
1073 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Coship.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Jq22.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ztouch4.gather.shushang-z.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Coship.com.
Page size can be reduced by 306.1 kB (72%)
426.6 kB
120.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Coship.com main page is 426.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 243.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Coship needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 173.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coship.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (35%)
57
37
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coship. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coship.com
929 ms
www.coship.com
10736 ms
lib.min.css
940 ms
page_index.min.css
586 ms
doc.css
1073 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1240 ms
jquery.js
1882 ms
lib.min.js
1854 ms
1853 ms
1852 ms
jquery-2.1.1.js
1792 ms
jquery.SS.js
1793 ms
SS_app.js
1794 ms
doc.js
1755 ms
bootstrap.js
1538 ms
visittrack.js
5222 ms
span.css
947 ms
sitemap.css
875 ms
rcode.css
934 ms
scroll.css
2568 ms
db6e5fe2-8410-493a-8ba7-48381d450ed4.png
975 ms
menu.png
909 ms
59cfe342-7e58-4e0a-b69c-366473aa9a99.png
908 ms
greager.png
940 ms
666ebae0-ffa7-4543-9629-fbb775501a65.png
940 ms
8b0450a4-ccd9-4976-8863-069f5764705f.png
864 ms
menupro3.png
898 ms
menupro4.png
899 ms
menupro5.png
959 ms
28f5f090-37f7-46a9-ba30-c0147c1a78a1.png
960 ms
9bb7aa19-cfb3-497c-a774-866317285d3e.jpg
1125 ms
fc837c7d-3dd6-4750-8019-c933fe4888d7.jpg
1683 ms
3216c096-afa8-411c-b54a-5408efc8ffe3.jpg
2337 ms
9a28ed02-0403-4425-a1be-d3c3f0153d9c.jpg
875 ms
c962e567-9f2c-4fd0-8c69-1d92ebfcf1f0.jpg
1396 ms
11425dbc-bb45-4153-bffd-01cf8fdc2156.jpg
1433 ms
2fc2cedb-69a0-4f7c-bb11-ac633637549e.png
2086 ms
d213c347-6e00-49d1-9cd9-895e976de914.png
2436 ms
8f3b9b29-9dcd-4c11-b72c-83e55c0898f2.png
2083 ms
40ab60d0-9a0a-4e90-bd4c-5b76b6948c99.png
2419 ms
126f263b-dd44-498d-8477-7ae9d8e6f8c3.png
2417 ms
9ea6f97f-7a05-4688-bc7b-5fb52ef66189.jpg
2687 ms
0ae51210-1718-4f8e-af08-5501a7750b31.png
2403 ms
8ec57650-5c2e-4f0b-adce-68c41ef989a9.jpg
2388 ms
pro4.jpg
2388 ms
04429069-864b-4d29-b957-a700be9a0f3e.png
2456 ms
6025d992-b258-4eb0-b856-470c0db1a92d.jpg
2656 ms
534637e7-22a9-4cef-b4ee-193023e47cfd.jpg
2632 ms
ftcode.jpg
2631 ms
ftwx.jpg
2631 ms
index_120.jpg
2629 ms
newsbg.jpg
2757 ms
loading2.gif
1486 ms
z1.jpg
1485 ms
z2.jpg
1486 ms
max1200.css
859 ms
jquery.min.js
1516 ms
max992.css
433 ms
max768.css
1588 ms
max600.css
787 ms
coship.com SEO score
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coship.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Coship.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coship.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coship. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: