2.8 sec in total
222 ms
1.9 sec
675 ms
Visit cost-ofliving.net now to see the best up-to-date Cost Of Living content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cost-ofliving.net
The ‘Cost of Living’ site is for all people interested in the politics, economics and sociology of health and health care. We aim to provide a vibrant mix of topical comment pieces, analytical feature...
Visit cost-ofliving.netWe analyzed Cost-ofliving.net page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
cost-ofliving.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.662
8/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
222 ms
479 ms
132 ms
134 ms
167 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Cost-ofliving.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to 0.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Cost-ofliving.net.
Page size can be reduced by 671.5 kB (34%)
2.0 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Cost-ofliving.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 345.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cost Of Living needs image optimization as it can save up to 345.6 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 164.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cost-ofliving.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 112.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (35%)
66
43
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cost Of Living. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cost-ofliving.net
222 ms
www.cost-ofliving.net
479 ms
owl.carousel.css
132 ms
owl.theme.css
134 ms
style.css
167 ms
bwp-recent-comments.css
136 ms
se-styles.css
137 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
138 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
199 ms
jetpack.css
206 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
owl.carousel.js
240 ms
spin.js
238 ms
jquery.spin.js
237 ms
external-tracking.min.js
242 ms
menu.js
265 ms
infinity.js
310 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
306 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
256 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
51 ms
line.png
135 ms
col-logo.png
136 ms
searchIcon.png
133 ms
blank.png
94 ms
cat-ding-reviews.png
136 ms
cat-ding-features.png
141 ms
cat-ding-comment.png
142 ms
5044999433_eea37cbb1d_z-640x320.jpg
361 ms
23565682946_de1a6c01be_z-640x320.jpg
295 ms
5032594454_45aa11d4a7_z-2-320x320.jpg
319 ms
5929568821_8f063c3100_z-320x320.jpg
252 ms
4698948915_d1f7944bf2_z-320x320.jpg
341 ms
2016-02-23_17h42_02-320x320.png
364 ms
4430656051_9997ca12d0_z-320x320.jpg
402 ms
2633307750_13ddbfe16f_z-320x320.jpg
475 ms
shutterstock_317352794-320x320.jpg
406 ms
207254784_bcaf7b32bc_z-320x320.jpg
498 ms
2786014500_5daf33e7b5_z-320x320.jpg
507 ms
2016-01-19_20h36_13-320x320.png
753 ms
2016-01-13_19h12_08-320x225.png
678 ms
2016-01-12_15h35_35-320x320.png
594 ms
16018349609_d5bdb0b76d_z-320x320.jpg
609 ms
2015-12-09_17h28_36-320x320.png
583 ms
6777222367_ef8f2b2ae8_z-320x320.jpg
587 ms
2015-11-26_19h37_00-320x320.png
895 ms
3542341781_2e07e18657_z-320x320.jpg
670 ms
14356989180_eb1f78b35d_z-320x320.jpg
682 ms
8467210161_7df6443235_z-320x320.jpg
748 ms
2015-11-12_17h56_54-320x320.png
1018 ms
dp3ww1eqzz737x6yhw69_normal.png
769 ms
Medsoc.png
767 ms
05d652843c87ad0113d4591f2d041d84
123 ms
wave-hair.png
793 ms
twit-large.png
797 ms
fb-large.png
818 ms
ProximaNova-Reg-webfont.woff
833 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
56 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
57 ms
email-large.png
818 ms
rss-large.png
808 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
28 ms
icon_comment.png
810 ms
larr-1.png
815 ms
rarr-1.png
837 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
28 ms
cat-ding-comment-white.png
848 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
30 ms
cost-ofliving.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
cost-ofliving.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cost-ofliving.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cost-ofliving.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cost-ofliving.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cost-ofliving.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cost Of Living. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: