Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

Page Load Speed

10.5 sec in total

First Response

2.9 sec

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

cotric.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cotric.com now to see the best up-to-date Cotric content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cotric.com

Visit cotric.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cotric.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cotric.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cotric.com

2860 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

378 ms

bootstrap.min.css

966 ms

font-awesome.min.css

529 ms

style.css

525 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Cotric.com, 13% (2 requests) were made to X4.kitunebi.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Asumi.shinobi.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Cotric.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.5 kB (74%)

Content Size

331.1 kB

After Optimization

84.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Cotric.com main page is 331.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 157.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 18.0 kB
  • After minification 16.2 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 105.2 kB

  • Original 157.6 kB
  • After minification 157.2 kB
  • After compression 52.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 105.2 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 128.5 kB

  • Original 155.5 kB
  • After minification 148.0 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cotric.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cotric. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cotric.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

cotric.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

cotric.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cotric.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Japanese. Our system also found out that Cotric.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cotric. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: