22.2 sec in total
147 ms
20.2 sec
1.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Coverlock Vergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coverlock-vergleich.de
III➤ Was ist eine Coverlock Nähmaschine? Wie sieht ein Coverstich aus? Welche Nähprojekte sind mir einer Covermaschine möglich?
Visit coverlock-vergleich.deWe analyzed Coverlock-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 22 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
coverlock-vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value17.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.116
85/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
147 ms
96 ms
73 ms
81 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Coverlock-vergleich.de, 7% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) relates to the external source Ir-de.amazon-adsystem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 119.0 kB (5%)
2.4 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Coverlock-vergleich.de main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coverlock Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coverlock-vergleich.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (39%)
84
51
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coverlock Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coverlock-vergleich.de
147 ms
wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css
96 ms
style.min.css
73 ms
screen.min.css
81 ms
bootstrap.min.css
132 ms
style.css
115 ms
font-awesome.min.css
111 ms
css
52 ms
css
65 ms
style.css
126 ms
lightbox.css
136 ms
css
71 ms
kirki-styles.css
141 ms
jquery.js
201 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
164 ms
1268.css
172 ms
js
71 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
59 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
67 ms
style-min.css
171 ms
bootstrap.min.js
178 ms
scripts.js
378 ms
select2.min.js
390 ms
comment-reply.min.js
379 ms
lightbox.js
389 ms
wp-embed.min.js
389 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
390 ms
js.cookie.min.js
389 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
389 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
455 ms
front.min.js
452 ms
lB5CN21P2vw
310 ms
q
170 ms
ir
19677 ms
ca61f91f008d7555e9a74352c0ccb908
390 ms
publicon.php
1140 ms
icon.php
588 ms
N%C3%A4hmaschineCoverlock.png
223 ms
b-iloveimg-resized-iloveimg-compressed.jpg
427 ms
store-1338629_1280-iloveimg-compressed-1024x690.jpg
471 ms
81Tq3KdkYL._SL1500_-262x282.jpg
376 ms
41Av3IX5noL-262x230.jpg
424 ms
616Mp5txvIL._SL1000_-262x262.jpg
424 ms
41AkWr3EXFL-262x262.jpg
423 ms
IMG_6719-iloveimg-compressed-iloveimg-resized.jpg
425 ms
IMG_6721-iloveimg-compressed-iloveimg-resized.jpg
471 ms
Overlock-und-Coverlock.jpg
481 ms
Coverlock-und-N%C3%A4hmaschine.jpg
473 ms
sewing-machine-1369658_640-iloveimg-compressed.jpg
472 ms
IMG_7529-iloveimg-resized.jpg
476 ms
IMG_7530-iloveimg-resized.jpg
541 ms
IMG_7531-iloveimg-resized.jpg
543 ms
IMG_7532-iloveimg-resized.jpg
583 ms
IMG_7534-iloveimg-resized.jpg
584 ms
IMG_7535-iloveimg-resized.jpg
585 ms
Praxistaugliche-Coverlock.jpg
922 ms
magnifying-glass-1019870_640.jpg
922 ms
41AkWr3EXFL-162x162.jpg
921 ms
41BdGrp8oeL._SL1000_-257x300.jpg
793 ms
41Av3IX5noL-162x142.jpg
920 ms
41Av3IX5noL-300x263.jpg
922 ms
81Tq3KdkYL._SL1500_-162x174.jpg
923 ms
3736e5930fa2d4bb3229ad134f3f40a8
422 ms
e5c7fc09ceb935b1d57c9aaf92f19771
467 ms
81Tq3KdkYL._SL1500_-952x1024-iloveimg-compressed-iloveimg-resized.jpg
783 ms
feedback-2800867_640-iloveimg-compressed-300x221.png
782 ms
sewing-2321532_640-iloveimg-compressed.jpg
782 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
72 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
73 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
223 ms
or3hQ67z0_CI33voSYTwJrM.woff
269 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
770 ms
ez-toc-icomoon.ttf
769 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
772 ms
question-2309040_640.jpg
864 ms
N%C3%A4hfrau-iloveimg-cropped-909x1024.png
866 ms
41Av3IX5noL-50x50.jpg
753 ms
fontello.woff
799 ms
41HwSBm4kDL-50x50.jpg
707 ms
41x8wE5CkpL-50x50.jpg
797 ms
lB5CN21P2vw
215 ms
512Oa2mpSjL._SL1000_-50x50.jpg
644 ms
71miPczYMIL._SL1500_-50x50.jpg
597 ms
61k1MNyicVL._SL1024_-50x50.jpg
670 ms
81Tq3KdkYL._SL1500_-50x50.jpg
668 ms
41AkWr3EXFL-50x50.jpg
666 ms
616Mp5txvIL._SL1000_-50x50.jpg
624 ms
icon-prime.png
592 ms
www-player.css
6 ms
www-embed-player.js
47 ms
base.js
91 ms
ad_status.js
355 ms
e4KNrNezHvGe_SA60BxYba8nt93XKTbVAQxfSxUqUHI.js
232 ms
embed.js
142 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
78 ms
ez-toc-icomoon.woff
110 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
137 ms
Create
156 ms
id
118 ms
ez-toc-icomoon.svg
135 ms
publicon.png
111 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
log_event
17 ms
coverlock-vergleich.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
coverlock-vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
coverlock-vergleich.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coverlock-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coverlock-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coverlock-vergleich.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Coverlock Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: