2 sec in total
95 ms
1.7 sec
210 ms
Visit cqg.com now to see the best up-to-date CQG content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cqg.com
Visit cqg.comWe analyzed Cqg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
cqg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
95 ms
314 ms
33 ms
63 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Cqg.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (368 ms) belongs to the original domain Cqg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 615.2 kB (28%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Cqg.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CQG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 394.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 156.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cqg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 156.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (54%)
46
21
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CQG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cqg.com
95 ms
www.cqg.com
314 ms
css_lQaZfjVpwP_oGNqdtWCSpJT1EMqXdMiU84ekLLxQnc4.css
33 ms
css_OxXNMIkXjMiK441-HAhoUAmXReSKeF_-c3U1gLLg3ws.css
63 ms
css_txCz7yOG0hmOaBkJ5nVj_5lzPanI15moQ0cOEkx3Lxs.css
65 ms
css_LodbpzGfi46l0sx5zIgdmZdLc6gkQaZJiaGSfH99TAk.css
131 ms
aggregator-feed-1.css
72 ms
block-2.css
73 ms
block-3.css
61 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
js_3TykeRWpejhD4-J3vdlaNXdULg9xhOZhbsppK0o2bUs.js
92 ms
signals.min.js
93 ms
lodash.min.js
93 ms
knockout-3.1.0.js
86 ms
Long.min.js
89 ms
ByteBuffer.min.js
92 ms
ProtoBuf.js
186 ms
FreeWidgetsNew.min.js
122 ms
lightbox.js
124 ms
js_I8yX6RYPZb7AtMcDUA3QKDZqVkvEn35ED11_1i7vVpc.js
119 ms
js_kCfJah0_HeO5Ny4PsKCLs9ohpYxEiho_APhwl3t1zIs.js
162 ms
js_L50O_PWoAuMOxVjnzZCkNSSmI0kFwhZsO1_KS8WnGKw.js
161 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
logo_CQG.png
69 ms
carousel_ic.jpg
295 ms
carousel_spreader.jpg
295 ms
carousel_qt.jpg
262 ms
carousel_fx.jpg
271 ms
carousel_t.jpg
237 ms
carousel_m.jpg
281 ms
cqgm_action.jpg
297 ms
video_action.jpg
294 ms
forum_action.jpg
304 ms
rtd_action.jpg
343 ms
widgets.js
40 ms
ico_soc_twitter.png
307 ms
ico_soc_fb.png
304 ms
ico_soc_g+.png
307 ms
ico_soc_in.png
307 ms
ico_soc_yt.png
308 ms
ico_soc_mw.png
324 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
325 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
368 ms
linkid.js
27 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
27 ms
collect
34 ms
syndication
105 ms
348166645673508864
196 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
6 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
8 ms
cqg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
cqg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cqg.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cqg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cqg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cqg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CQG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: