1.2 sec in total
90 ms
1.1 sec
72 ms
Click here to check amazing CS Parch content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about csparch.com
Visit csparch.comWe analyzed Csparch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
csparch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
90 ms
138 ms
174 ms
182 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Csparch.com, 26% (25 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (489 ms) relates to the external source Clickahome.ca.
Page size can be reduced by 76.0 kB (75%)
101.6 kB
25.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Csparch.com main page is 101.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 87.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CS Parch needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (92%)
60
5
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CS Parch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
csparch.com
90 ms
csparch.com
138 ms
main.css
174 ms
style.min.css
182 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
162 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
165 ms
swiper.min.css
163 ms
post-54117.css
160 ms
slick-carousal.css
185 ms
css
35 ms
all.css
184 ms
solid.min.css
183 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
185 ms
global.css
193 ms
bootstrap.css
198 ms
font-awesome.min.css
204 ms
flaticon.css
200 ms
lightgallery.css
201 ms
style.css
207 ms
royal-preload.css
214 ms
post-54131.css
218 ms
fontawesome.min.css
222 ms
jquery.min.js
244 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
222 ms
myloadmore.js
232 ms
core.min.js
233 ms
slick.js
239 ms
custom-tm.js
242 ms
js
56 ms
post-4543.css
316 ms
brands.min.css
317 ms
rs6.css
316 ms
rbtools.min.js
318 ms
rs6.min.js
356 ms
custom.js
316 ms
royal_preloader.min.js
317 ms
swiper.min.js
318 ms
mousewheel.min.js
316 ms
lightgallery-all.min.js
317 ms
isotope.min.js
163 ms
easypiechart.min.js
163 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
159 ms
before-after.js
159 ms
elementor.js
147 ms
elementor-header.js
178 ms
scripts.js
178 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
177 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
177 ms
waypoints.min.js
177 ms
frontend.min.js
170 ms
sticky-element.js
165 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
162 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
162 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
159 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
155 ms
hooks.min.js
155 ms
i18n.min.js
153 ms
frontend.min.js
139 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
165 ms
csp-newlogo-white-1.png
182 ms
close.png
182 ms
dummy.png
182 ms
helveticaneue-roman-webfont.woff
489 ms
helveticaneue-roman-webfont.woff
95 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdM3mCw.woff
96 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGIVzZQ.woff
97 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffAzHGIVzZQ.woff
173 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGIVzZQ.woff
181 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGIVzZQ.woff
182 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffEDBGIVzZQ.woff
181 ms
Flaticon.svg
377 ms
Flaticon.woff
171 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDr0fJg.woff
181 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDr0fJg.woff
241 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDr0fJg.woff
239 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDr0fJg.woff
181 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDr0fJg.woff
182 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejLDr0fJg.woff
182 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4cHLDr0fJg.woff
201 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
199 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
201 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
202 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
201 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
202 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
204 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
202 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
202 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKSbpUVz0Eg.woff
44 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMhhKSbpUVz0Eqq2.woff
43 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMlhKSbpUVz0Eqq2.woff
42 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMhhKQ.woff
39 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQbMhhKQ.woff
40 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQbMhhKQ.woff
41 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMhhKQ.woff
41 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XbMhhKQ.woff
42 ms
csparch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
csparch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
csparch.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Csparch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Csparch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
csparch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CS Parch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: