1.6 sec in total
429 ms
685 ms
489 ms
Visit cssjockey.com now to see the best up-to-date CSSJockey content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cssjockey.com
Unique & Practical Digital Presence
Visit cssjockey.comWe analyzed Cssjockey.com page load time and found that the first response time was 429 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
cssjockey.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value4.5 s
71/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
91/100
10%
429 ms
9 ms
17 ms
16 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Cssjockey.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (429 ms) belongs to the original domain Cssjockey.com.
Page size can be reduced by 654.0 kB (34%)
1.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Cssjockey.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CSSJockey images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 111.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 486.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cssjockey.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 486.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (56%)
32
14
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CSSJockey. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cssjockey.com
429 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
9 ms
crayon.min.css
17 ms
feeldesign.css
16 ms
monaco.css
18 ms
prettyPhoto.css
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
22 ms
animate.css
19 ms
dashicons.min.css
36 ms
theme.css
27 ms
cj-global.css
31 ms
jetpack.css
32 ms
jquery.js
37 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
34 ms
crayon.min.js
36 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
84 ms
plugins.js
39 ms
theme.js
36 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
css
25 ms
logo-leaf.png
59 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
expand-images-to-parent-container.png
58 ms
product-image-590.png
56 ms
upgrades.png
56 ms
chat-bubble-post-thumb.jpg
57 ms
cssjockey-strong-password.png
83 ms
cssjockey-wordpress.png
58 ms
screenshot.png
80 ms
arrow-left.png
56 ms
logo-black.png
57 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
54 ms
g.gif
27 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37ZobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
27 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
27 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
28 ms
collect
26 ms
collect
67 ms
cssjockey.com accessibility score
cssjockey.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
cssjockey.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cssjockey.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cssjockey.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cssjockey.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CSSJockey. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: