Tools & Wizards About Us
cybercrimecontrol.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

cybercrimecontrol.in

Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

551 ms

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

697 ms

cybercrimecontrol.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cybercrimecontrol.in homepage info - get ready to check Cybercrimecontrol best content right away, or after learning these important things about cybercrimecontrol.in

Visit cybercrimecontrol.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Cybercrimecontrol.in page load time and found that the first response time was 551 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cybercrimecontrol.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.cybercrimecontrol.in

551 ms

hc9BDsIwDATADxFMT7yBVyDXcSpDnERxQgWvp1Qg9VJx3R2ttANQTg2puZCrujNIotg9G5AZWHtGtsMAlR8WxXOF0scoBGjG7Yu4NUnTh82FIodf6cXaKhQlHVXSIm52pawl2zK12djEhxNctFR-IYSKynOu99V0cyMa7_ZhOeJwZsv6B6kPsisUpyRByJVcenkD.css

1081 ms

M9D3zC0oSq1K1E8uLtYvLqnMSQUA.css

741 ms

VY1BCgIxDEUv1DHjEUQ3HkC3JUxTKKZNSdoZxtNbQUR3j8_j_RmuuSo9ERYzULIqxdJKbqvTIqVRadArCwYDy4nJx7EaXChi5x9wR7hxSxkb-fvZn0IYIUAzGlJOZXr3-8c4jMHN3-uomGkTfcBKJYiCyo5snAL98Qs.css

1027 ms

css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Cybercrimecontrol.in, 17% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Cybercrimecontrol.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (68%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

899.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cybercrimecontrol.in main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 68.8 kB
  • After minification 67.8 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 82.5 kB

  • Original 651.1 kB
  • After minification 568.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cybercrimecontrol needs image optimization as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 383.4 kB

  • Original 542.3 kB
  • After minification 542.0 kB
  • After compression 158.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 383.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 158.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cybercrimecontrol.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cybercrimecontrol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cybercrimecontrol.in

www.cybercrimecontrol.in

551 ms

hc9BDsIwDATADxFMT7yBVyDXcSpDnERxQgWvp1Qg9VJx3R2ttANQTg2puZCrujNIotg9G5AZWHtGtsMAlR8WxXOF0scoBGjG7Yu4NUnTh82FIodf6cXaKhQlHVXSIm52pawl2zK12djEhxNctFR-IYSKynOu99V0cyMa7_ZhOeJwZsv6B6kPsisUpyRByJVcenkD.css

hc9BDsIwDATADxFMT7yBVyDXcSpDnERxQgWvp1Qg9VJx3R2ttANQTg2puZCrujNIotg9G5AZWHtGtsMAlR8WxXOF0scoBGjG7Yu4NUnTh82FIodf6cXaKhQlHVXSIm52pawl2zK12djEhxNctFR-IYSKynOu99V0cyMa7_ZhOeJwZsv6B6kPsisUpyRByJVcenkD.css

1081 ms

M9D3zC0oSq1K1E8uLtYvLqnMSQUA.css

M9D3zC0oSq1K1E8uLtYvLqnMSQUA.css

741 ms

VY1BCgIxDEUv1DHjEUQ3HkC3JUxTKKZNSdoZxtNbQUR3j8_j_RmuuSo9ERYzULIqxdJKbqvTIqVRadArCwYDy4nJx7EaXChi5x9wR7hxSxkb-fvZn0IYIUAzGlJOZXr3-8c4jMHN3-uomGkTfcBKJYiCyo5snAL98Qs.css

VY1BCgIxDEUv1DHjEUQ3HkC3JUxTKKZNSdoZxtNbQUR3j8_j_RmuuSo9ERYzULIqxdJKbqvTIqVRadArCwYDy4nJx7EaXChi5x9wR7hxSxkb-fvZn0IYIUAzGlJOZXr3-8c4jMHN3-uomGkTfcBKJYiCyo5snAL98Qs.css

1027 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

71 ms

nY5RCgIxDEQvtN0iewLxDPq71Da4WZqmNomwt7dC_Rf_Bua9YRa_Pw3aMS0jOMJHCwozYZlOvsFLMiZovto9Y_RBBFT8LoOfdQOCaiVuszJn-UfsMGdT5DLsa1ak_mK9XdZzSlzk6_fe9Q0bgKuhBZJftWiiTB_6DQ.js

nY5RCgIxDEQvtN0iewLxDPq71Da4WZqmNomwt7dC_Rf_Bua9YRa_Pw3aMS0jOMJHCwozYZlOvsFLMiZovto9Y_RBBFT8LoOfdQOCaiVuszJn-UfsMGdT5DLsa1ak_mK9XdZzSlzk6_fe9Q0bgKuhBZJftWiiTB_6DQ.js

1280 ms

css

css

54 ms

M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js

M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js

501 ms

hZBRDoIwEEQvRKkmJp7BYzTtAIvdtu62IXh6IX75gfzOvExm5mp9TtX5aoYsbO6Wko8tQO2sVr1Qqdpd7IOL4O3sII6xZHnu9vxqkLWHU0pjz5ROQHZjooG8Kbm0cgIrcYko0XlMOQbIEU9bLDRmFxCOmKa9z4I_9kJhxM_Ur14nMLrb9hIzUjWyVVr3rR8.js

hZBRDoIwEEQvRKkmJp7BYzTtAIvdtu62IXh6IX75gfzOvExm5mp9TtX5aoYsbO6Wko8tQO2sVr1Qqdpd7IOL4O3sII6xZHnu9vxqkLWHU0pjz5ROQHZjooG8Kbm0cgIrcYko0XlMOQbIEU9bLDRmFxCOmKa9z4I_9kJhxM_Ur14nMLrb9hIzUjWyVVr3rR8.js

798 ms

M9EvL9BNzU1KTdHLzcwDAA.js

M9EvL9BNzU1KTdHLzcwDAA.js

798 ms

hY1BDsIwDAQ_RGt4AuLEA-AaGeKilDgOdlpUXk-KFKk3rqOZ3T2cOSt9EAZFprfoE2ZKXhRUFowWgyeF8TWRLv0G9RzS7gCjubtwFqsSmlGxirbUDSqpVPMSS2As5K4nd_RekrWgLnVr9PvoMGfCNv83mppwe6zJFw.js

hY1BDsIwDAQ_RGt4AuLEA-AaGeKilDgOdlpUXk-KFKk3rqOZ3T2cOSt9EAZFprfoE2ZKXhRUFowWgyeF8TWRLv0G9RzS7gCjubtwFqsSmlGxirbUDSqpVPMSS2As5K4nd_RekrWgLnVr9PvoMGfCNv83mppwe6zJFw.js

1223 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

309 ms

CCC.png

CCC.png

633 ms

law-icon.png

law-icon.png

632 ms

1.png

1.png

632 ms

2.png

2.png

631 ms

33.png

33.png

631 ms

law-300x300.png

law-300x300.png

631 ms

ty.png

ty.png

1354 ms

CCC-1.png

CCC-1.png

829 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

21 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

21 ms

BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf

BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf

510 ms

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

511 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1698 ms

LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

502 ms

PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

493 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

263 ms

grab.png

grab.png

272 ms

Banners-01.jpg

Banners-01.jpg

1033 ms

Banners-02.jpg

Banners-02.jpg

1508 ms

Banners-03.jpg

Banners-03.jpg

1557 ms

testimonials-02.jpg

testimonials-02.jpg

1827 ms

testimonials-01.jpg

testimonials-01.jpg

1538 ms

SEO Factors

cybercrimecontrol.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cybercrimecontrol.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cybercrimecontrol.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cybercrimecontrol.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cybercrimecontrol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: