3.4 sec in total
355 ms
2.1 sec
908 ms
Click here to check amazing Liposuction Cliniccompare content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk
Compare liposuction prices with Clinic Compare. Affordable liposuction treatment from the UK's top fat removal clinics and save £100's!
Visit liposuction.cliniccompare.co.ukWe analyzed Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 355 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value3,050 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.625
10/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
355 ms
158 ms
165 ms
169 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk, 30% (27 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 8% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (821 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 213.1 kB (29%)
744.8 kB
531.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk main page is 744.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 411.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 687 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liposuction Cliniccompare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.3 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (63%)
88
33
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liposuction Cliniccompare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk
355 ms
trustpilot.css
158 ms
css_e798c2b444cf7d609df1c648113c1f56_8.css
165 ms
css_8f9e27336907e8baecca95ef08206abf_8.css
169 ms
css_ef29f115cda16e134d812ee31040329d_8.css
163 ms
css_9e0c99e70e8495cf93ba8fcaddc7ad8d_8.css
247 ms
js_63d360445de0ba1aa547f37f21351466_8.js
255 ms
js_55e2122a8d3ff186764ee9a48178760c_8.js
237 ms
js_6ed998fcbe0c46a8a2adfc64ad43f128_8.js
324 ms
js_42555ad898573a14678f40d0ccb97aaa_4.js
243 ms
webform_paging.js
268 ms
all.js
268 ms
E-v1.js
39 ms
E-v1.js
106 ms
widgets.js
137 ms
plusone.js
74 ms
js_d44ae232c8a7e2d14aeee400f8333a37_9.js
245 ms
j.php
24 ms
female-front-liposuction-small.jpg
332 ms
space.gif
306 ms
female-back-liposuction-small.jpg
331 ms
social-media-sprite.svg
132 ms
logo.svg
134 ms
arrow-down.svg
133 ms
liposuction.jpg
178 ms
logo-metro.jpg
134 ms
logo-the-guardian.png
131 ms
logo-daily-mail.png
179 ms
logo-the-independent.png
180 ms
footer-awards-2015.png
328 ms
Montserrat-Light.otf
315 ms
AGaramondPro-Regular.otf
420 ms
v.gif
13 ms
va-089a4b18149b1b0e644c997aef6f92d6.js
6 ms
117 ms
more-arrows.png
266 ms
ai1y27bv11
87 ms
faq-arrow.svg
255 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
207 ms
footer-team-sprite.jpg
194 ms
featured-logo-sprite.png
249 ms
ga.js
121 ms
ai1y27bv11
102 ms
xd_arbiter.php
283 ms
xd_arbiter.php
534 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
250 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
136 ms
fastbutton
165 ms
form-arrow.svg
131 ms
comments.php
125 ms
like.php
153 ms
collect
160 ms
n7IAcY2jJIh.css
379 ms
n--mLoVmLJM.css
433 ms
fDJtYk6rQA0.css
447 ms
uOFrTixURdn.css
512 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
580 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
578 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
449 ms
rFmE1g6Dkoz.js
701 ms
7cm7D75Y0Sf.js
624 ms
DKRU1bYTkTw.js
623 ms
LU4a_W5X-JG.js
649 ms
sj-JwAJi4AH.js
648 ms
AunibtBOmSk.js
646 ms
Nvkj5df-gdk.js
653 ms
336JejShbZp.js
651 ms
Q4A0UyjU8W2.js
741 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
743 ms
DnwTulctFaE.js
745 ms
like.php
100 ms
postmessageRelay
127 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
108 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
87 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
821 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
654 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
56 ms
api.js
55 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
95 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
74 ms
jot
107 ms
fav.png
14 ms
odA9sNLrE86.jpg
71 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
68 ms
a-ZN6WoEOje.png
69 ms
W0OV23mIOyO.js
69 ms
36TdwhIHusi.js
76 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
76 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
137 ms
liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liposuction.cliniccompare.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liposuction Cliniccompare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: