Tools & Wizards About Us
reviews.cnet.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

reviews.cnet.co.uk

Reviews - CNET

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

227 ms

reviews.cnet.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit reviews.cnet.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Reviews CNET content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviews.cnet.co.uk

When it comes to in-depth product analysis, nobody does it better than CNET.

Visit reviews.cnet.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviews.cnet.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviews.cnet.co.uk performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,270 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reviews.cnet.co.uk

222 ms

426 ms

main.desktop-0e1e190115-rev.css

111 ms

review.desktop-d818c5a888-rev.css

169 ms

gpt.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reviews.cnet.co.uk, 24% (10 requests) were made to Cnet3.cbsistatic.com and 20% (8 requests) were made to Cnet4.cbsistatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (426 ms) relates to the external source Cnet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (55%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reviews.cnet.co.uk main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 749.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 139.4 kB

  • Original 184.8 kB
  • After minification 163.8 kB
  • After compression 45.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 43.3 kB

  • Original 749.6 kB
  • After minification 706.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviews CNET images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 420.0 kB

  • Original 608.9 kB
  • After minification 566.6 kB
  • After compression 188.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 420.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 614.9 kB

  • Original 683.7 kB
  • After minification 682.6 kB
  • After compression 68.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviews.cnet.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 614.9 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (26%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviews CNET. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reviews.cnet.co.uk

reviews.cnet.co.uk

222 ms

426 ms

main.desktop-0e1e190115-rev.css

main.desktop-0e1e190115-rev.css

111 ms

review.desktop-d818c5a888-rev.css

review.desktop-d818c5a888-rev.css

169 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

36 ms

ls-cnet.js

ls-cnet.js

16 ms

morpheus.cnet.1591.js

morpheus.cnet.1591.js

56 ms

nav.js

nav.js

123 ms

mpulse.js

mpulse.js

117 ms

require-2.1.2.js

require-2.1.2.js

229 ms

38QDY-8CT77-8XNH2-VJQTD-EK4YX

38QDY-8CT77-8XNH2-VJQTD-EK4YX

83 ms

logo_192.png

logo_192.png

63 ms

galaxy-note-8-7769-001.jpg

galaxy-note-8-7769-001.jpg

256 ms

xiaomi-mi-a1-002.jpg

xiaomi-mi-a1-002.jpg

266 ms

asus-zenfone-3-zoom-001.jpg

asus-zenfone-3-zoom-001.jpg

64 ms

amazon-wand-2.jpg

amazon-wand-2.jpg

63 ms

snes-classic-nintendo.png

snes-classic-nintendo.png

135 ms

crop.jpg

crop.jpg

263 ms

iphone-8-keynote.png

iphone-8-keynote.png

269 ms

ozmo-930-top.png

ozmo-930-top.png

272 ms

87e33599-6f1d-426a-9b8a-336d438e1285.jpg

87e33599-6f1d-426a-9b8a-336d438e1285.jpg

261 ms

panasonic-movable-fridge-sake-cooler.jpg

panasonic-movable-fridge-sake-cooler.jpg

262 ms

apple-ipad-2017-09.jpg

apple-ipad-2017-09.jpg

269 ms

apple-airpods-2016-014.jpg

apple-airpods-2016-014.jpg

272 ms

beats-studio-wireless-3-blue-2.jpg

beats-studio-wireless-3-blue-2.jpg

133 ms

beats-studio-wireless-3-blue-2.jpg

beats-studio-wireless-3-blue-2.jpg

167 ms

pubg-promo.jpg

pubg-promo.jpg

166 ms

microsoft-surface-pro-03.jpg

microsoft-surface-pro-03.jpg

165 ms

google-wifi-6504-001.jpg

google-wifi-6504-001.jpg

167 ms

gsocho-8879-043.jpg

gsocho-8879-043.jpg

58 ms

one-plus-5-4431.jpg

one-plus-5-4431.jpg

58 ms

pubads_impl_147.js

pubads_impl_147.js

165 ms

Regular.woff

Regular.woff

106 ms

Bold.woff

Bold.woff

72 ms

config.js

config.js

54 ms

icon-seffe839e03.png

icon-seffe839e03.png

54 ms

Regular.woff

Regular.woff

102 ms

Light.woff

Light.woff

101 ms

container.html

container.html

74 ms

config.json

config.json

19 ms

main.default.js

main.default.js

17 ms

Accessibility Review

reviews.cnet.co.uk accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

reviews.cnet.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reviews.cnet.co.uk SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviews.cnet.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Reviews.cnet.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reviews.cnet.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reviews CNET. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: