Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

traffic.chrisc.com

Info Cash | Member Portal

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

158 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

traffic.chrisc.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Traffic Chrisc content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about traffic.chrisc.com

Visit traffic.chrisc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Traffic.chrisc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 158 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

traffic.chrisc.com performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

members.php

158 ms

style.css

143 ms

logo1.png

152 ms

bg.jpg

73 ms

form-bg.png

142 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Traffic.chrisc.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (158 ms) relates to the external source Chrisc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

27.4 kB

After Optimization

25.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Traffic.chrisc.com main page is 27.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 25.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 857 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 610 B, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 857 B

  • Original 25.0 kB
  • After minification 24.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Traffic Chrisc images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Traffic Chrisc. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

traffic.chrisc.com accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

traffic.chrisc.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

traffic.chrisc.com SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Traffic.chrisc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Traffic.chrisc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Traffic Chrisc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: