9.6 sec in total
2.2 sec
5.4 sec
2 sec
Visit blog.digitalpapel.com now to see the best up-to-date Blog Digitalpapel content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.digitalpapel.com
El papel a la carta
Visit blog.digitalpapel.comWe analyzed Blog.digitalpapel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
blog.digitalpapel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.466
19/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
2247 ms
134 ms
826 ms
825 ms
826 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Blog.digitalpapel.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Blog.digitalpapel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 686.2 kB (28%)
2.5 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Blog.digitalpapel.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Digitalpapel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 317.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.digitalpapel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (50%)
60
30
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Digitalpapel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.digitalpapel.com
2247 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
134 ms
Event_Calendar_Widget_Style.css
826 ms
junaiticons.css
825 ms
style.css
826 ms
font-awesome.min.css
258 ms
css
31 ms
css
38 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
837 ms
css
61 ms
css
74 ms
style.css
1560 ms
kgvid_styles.css
385 ms
jetpack.css
518 ms
frontend.css
649 ms
jquery.js
915 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
933 ms
core.min.js
935 ms
Event_Calendar_Widget_Script.js
936 ms
script.js
958 ms
Light.css
1037 ms
blog.digitalpapel.com
1352 ms
widgets.js
82 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
15 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1166 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
1045 ms
plugins.js
1341 ms
global.js
1150 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1165 ms
style.css
487 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
linedpaper.png
563 ms
img-detalle-cabecera.jpg
448 ms
logo-blog.png
438 ms
image-overlay-icon.png
439 ms
Muestrario-de-sobres-670x376.jpg
438 ms
entry-meta-shadow.png
438 ms
home-weecomments-670x390.png
1157 ms
cantos-redondos-670x405.jpg
789 ms
INVITACIONES-BODA-3-MOD-670x405.jpg
708 ms
sobres-670x445.jpg
691 ms
pergaminos-blog.jpg
971 ms
TARJETON-15-petals-670x595.jpg
819 ms
papel-fluorescente-670x305.jpg
812 ms
papeles-creativos-670x670.jpg
974 ms
muestrarios-670x670.jpg
1023 ms
TARJETON-12-670x670.jpg
1169 ms
P1030556-670x479.jpg
1079 ms
papel-fotografico-de-lienzo-670x670.jpg
1507 ms
Captura-de-pantalla-2015-11-05-a-las-15.51.45-670x336.png
1493 ms
papeles-y-adhesivos-sinteticos-670x670.jpg
1264 ms
Tarjeta-de-boda-en-Conqueror-Contour.jpg
1462 ms
Cartulinas-Conqueror-670x670.jpg
1273 ms
papel-de-algodon-hecho-a-mano-670x670.jpg
1288 ms
Papeles-y-sobres-kraft-670x305.jpg
1383 ms
Muestrario-de-sobres-65x65.jpg
1395 ms
home-weecomments-65x65.png
1408 ms
cantos-redondos-65x65.jpg
1501 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
415 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
415 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
417 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
418 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
416 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNRl0pGnog23EMYRrBmUzJQ.ttf
82 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFP7R5lD_au4SZC6Ks_vyWs.ttf
390 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGKXvKVW_haheDNrHjziJZVk.ttf
412 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGOiMeWyi5E_-XkTgB5psiDg.ttf
413 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGPgXsetDviZcdR5OzC1KPcw.ttf
413 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBA_awHl7mXRjE_LQVochcU.ttf
411 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
411 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
414 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1471 ms
pinit.js
370 ms
collect
353 ms
pinit_main.js
28 ms
blog.digitalpapel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
blog.digitalpapel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
blog.digitalpapel.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.digitalpapel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.digitalpapel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.digitalpapel.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Digitalpapel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: