Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

656 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

dailycatcher.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dailycatcher.in homepage info - get ready to check Dailycatcher best content right away, or after learning these important things about dailycatcher.in

Deals per day in multiple cities of up to 90% off at restaurants, bars, spas, comedy clubs, sporting events, theaters, classes, retailers, hotels, salons and more

Visit dailycatcher.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Dailycatcher.in page load time and found that the first response time was 656 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dailycatcher.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

dailycatcher.in

656 ms

676 ms

common.css

132 ms

all-deals.css

136 ms

css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Dailycatcher.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (933 ms) belongs to the original domain Dailycatcher.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 598.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Dailycatcher.in main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 131.2 kB

  • Original 146.4 kB
  • After minification 94.4 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.9 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.2 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 233.5 kB

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dailycatcher images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 111.7 kB

  • Original 176.1 kB
  • After minification 158.8 kB
  • After compression 64.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 121.6 kB

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 99.5 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dailycatcher.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (16%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

83

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dailycatcher. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

dailycatcher.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dailycatcher.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Dailycatcher.in main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dailycatcher. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: