871 ms in total
323 ms
418 ms
130 ms
Welcome to debateware.com homepage info - get ready to check Debate Ware best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about debateware.com
Visit debateware.comWe analyzed Debateware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 548 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
debateware.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0.7 s
100/100
25%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
323 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Debateware.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (323 ms) belongs to the original domain Debateware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 4.3 kB (24%)
17.7 kB
13.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Debateware.com main page is 17.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 13.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 860 B, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Debate Ware needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
We found no issues to fix!
1
1
The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Debate Ware. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
debateware.com
323 ms
debatenet.png
83 ms
debateware.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
debateware.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
debateware.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Debateware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Debateware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
debateware.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Debate Ware. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: