Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

debateware.com

DebateWare.

Page Load Speed

871 ms in total

First Response

323 ms

Resources Loaded

418 ms

Page Rendered

130 ms

debateware.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to debateware.com homepage info - get ready to check Debate Ware best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about debateware.com

Visit debateware.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Debateware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 548 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

debateware.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

debateware.com

323 ms

debatenet.png

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Debateware.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (323 ms) belongs to the original domain Debateware.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

17.7 kB

After Optimization

13.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Debateware.com main page is 17.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 13.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 860 B, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 13.8 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Debate Ware needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Debate Ware. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

debateware.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

debateware.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

debateware.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Debateware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Debateware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Debate Ware. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: