2.3 sec in total
73 ms
1.9 sec
321 ms
Welcome to deckanddoor.com homepage info - get ready to check Deck And Door best content right away, or after learning these important things about deckanddoor.com
We are experienced custom deck builders serving the entire Minneapolis area for over 30 years. We can accommodate all deck design projects.
Visit deckanddoor.comWe analyzed Deckanddoor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
deckanddoor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.1 s
26/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value2,000 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
73 ms
483 ms
23 ms
46 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Deckanddoor.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 92.1 kB (14%)
670.0 kB
577.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Deckanddoor.com main page is 670.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 297.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Deck And Door images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 904 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deckanddoor.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (84%)
77
12
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Deck And Door. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
deckanddoor.com
73 ms
deckanddoor.com
483 ms
swiper.min.css
23 ms
tippy.css
46 ms
gs-logo.min.css
53 ms
style.min.css
60 ms
wpforms-base.min.css
46 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
44 ms
all.min.css
51 ms
back-compat.min.css
89 ms
js_composer.min.css
66 ms
css
57 ms
main.min.css
99 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
97 ms
wpbakery.min.css
113 ms
post-type.min.css
93 ms
css-vars.css
114 ms
custom.css
121 ms
media.css
142 ms
mega-menu.css
114 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
116 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
118 ms
style.css
134 ms
ultimate.min.css
156 ms
font-awesome.min.css
135 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
137 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
143 ms
frontend.min.css
143 ms
lightbox.min.css
147 ms
galleria.mediagrid.css
149 ms
lc-micro-slider.min.css
150 ms
custom.css
149 ms
jquery.min.js
151 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
196 ms
rbtools.min.js
200 ms
rs6.min.js
231 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
223 ms
core.min.js
222 ms
js
143 ms
css
88 ms
api.js
101 ms
stripes.css
253 ms
rs6.css
214 ms
ultimate.min.js
191 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
193 ms
main.min.js
191 ms
swiper.min.js
183 ms
tippy-bundle.umd.min.js
184 ms
images-loaded.min.js
198 ms
gs-logo.min.js
176 ms
legacy.min.js
167 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
162 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
164 ms
post-type.min.js
150 ms
frontend.js
154 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
147 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
152 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
146 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
130 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
136 ms
mailcheck.min.js
199 ms
punycode.min.js
130 ms
utils.min.js
191 ms
wpforms.min.js
190 ms
fbevents.js
191 ms
deckanddoor-logo.png
175 ms
deckanddoor-logo-sticky.png
175 ms
the7-chevron-down.svg
247 ms
dummy.png
248 ms
deckanddoor-bottom-logo.png
249 ms
dark-woodbg.png
712 ms
the7-chevron-side.svg
169 ms
js
151 ms
analytics.js
680 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
680 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
749 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
800 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
209 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
209 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
208 ms
web-animations.min.js
184 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
645 ms
collect
52 ms
recaptcha__en.js
94 ms
collect
149 ms
ga-audiences
21 ms
deckanddoor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
deckanddoor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
deckanddoor.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deckanddoor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Deckanddoor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
deckanddoor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Deck And Door. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: