6.3 sec in total
471 ms
5.1 sec
816 ms
Click here to check amazing DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about depot-konto-vergleich.de
llll➤ Aktueller Depotkonto Vergleich & Kostenrechner ✚✚ Wertpapierdepot News ✚✚ Forex ✚✚ ETF-Broker ☀☀☀☀☀ Die besten Depotkonten online ✚✚ Sparplanrechner ✚✚ Depotwechsel-Prämien ✚✚ Börsen-Anlagestrat...
Visit depot-konto-vergleich.deWe analyzed Depot-konto-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 471 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
depot-konto-vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value10,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
471 ms
1397 ms
207 ms
372 ms
344 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Depot-konto-vergleich.de, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Js.financeads.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Depot-konto-vergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 127.3 kB (16%)
806.5 kB
679.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Depot-konto-vergleich.de main page is 806.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 258.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Depot-konto-vergleich.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (64%)
97
35
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
depot-konto-vergleich.de
471 ms
www.depot-konto-vergleich.de
1397 ms
js
207 ms
sparplanrechner.js
372 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.js
344 ms
bootstrap.css
679 ms
fa_style.css
730 ms
style.min.css
488 ms
yasr.css
514 ms
screen.min.css
514 ms
widget-options.css
512 ms
wpk_p684593.css
761 ms
jquery.rateyo.min.css
789 ms
style.css
807 ms
adaptive.css
760 ms
retina.css
791 ms
ilightbox.css
790 ms
dark-skin.css
867 ms
jquery.isotope.css
863 ms
finance-business.css
927 ms
fontello.css
885 ms
animate.css
863 ms
css
430 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
914 ms
tablepress-responsive.min.css
992 ms
yasr-table-light.css
925 ms
jquery.min.js
1034 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
924 ms
jquery.rateyo.min.js
1033 ms
wpk_p684593.js
1107 ms
jsLibraries.min.js
1094 ms
jquery.iLightBox.min.js
1296 ms
fa_style_widget.css
1087 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js.gz
1350 ms
jquery.fa_qtip.css.gz
1084 ms
jquery.fa_qtip.css
1084 ms
fa_style_responsive.css
1270 ms
bootstrap_wp.min.css
1325 ms
font-awesome.min.css
451 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
1243 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
1244 ms
jquery.megaMenu.js
1241 ms
front.min.js
1245 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js
1246 ms
jquery.min.js
298 ms
bootstrap.min.js
374 ms
jqueryLibraries.min.js
1226 ms
analytics.js
220 ms
jquery.script.min.js
953 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
883 ms
highcharts.js
964 ms
exporting.js
879 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
880 ms
collect
203 ms
jquery.isotope.mode.min.js
711 ms
rater-js.min.js
712 ms
tippy.all.min.js
686 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
682 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
680 ms
hooks.min.js
672 ms
i18n.min.js
744 ms
visitorVotes.js
738 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
730 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
714 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
688 ms
responsive-tabs.js
680 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
681 ms
logo.png
232 ms
logo1.png
233 ms
130.png
233 ms
152.png
234 ms
181.png
313 ms
469.png
433 ms
124.png
434 ms
de-giro.jpg
432 ms
800.png
435 ms
277.png
435 ms
150.png
436 ms
157.png
515 ms
103.png
514 ms
191.png
513 ms
134.png
513 ms
107.png
512 ms
209.png
511 ms
flatex-logo.gif
614 ms
consorsbank-logo.gif
613 ms
bestes-kostenloses-depot-finden.jpg
613 ms
depotgebuehren-und-depotkosten.jpg
609 ms
wertpapierarten.jpg
541 ms
deutsche-boersen-und-elektronische-Handelsplattformen.jpg
540 ms
depotwechsel-depotuebertrag.jpg
853 ms
kosten-gebuehren-aktien-depot4.jpg
854 ms
onvista-bank-logo.gif
852 ms
consorsbank-logo.gif
849 ms
deutsche-bank-logo.gif
846 ms
ing-diba-logo.png
723 ms
sparkassen-broker-logo.gif
723 ms
kostenlose-etf-sparplaene-immer-mehr-auswahl-online-580x390.jpg
722 ms
mifid-2-aenderungen-2018.jpg
722 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo.woff
81 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdo.woff
81 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff
199 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo.woff
201 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdo.woff
204 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdo.woff
203 ms
fontello.woff
911 ms
depot-konto-vergleich.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
depot-konto-vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
depot-konto-vergleich.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Depot-konto-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Depot-konto-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
depot-konto-vergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: