2.7 sec in total
896 ms
1.5 sec
313 ms
Welcome to design-options.com homepage info - get ready to check Design Options best content right away, or after learning these important things about design-options.com
The Perspective you can't afford to ignore!
Visit design-options.comWe analyzed Design-options.com page load time and found that the first response time was 896 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Design-options.com rating and web reputation
design-options.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
896 ms
29 ms
33 ms
39 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Design-options.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (896 ms) belongs to the original domain Design-options.com.
Page size can be reduced by 536.7 kB (22%)
2.5 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Design-options.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design Options images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 211.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 211.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Design-options.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (64%)
50
18
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design Options. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
design-options.com
896 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
29 ms
stylesheet.css
33 ms
system-message.css
39 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
27 ms
main.min.css
28 ms
css
62 ms
genericons.css
46 ms
style.css
40 ms
newsletter.css
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
65 ms
jetpack.css
42 ms
jquery.js
47 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
37 ms
jquery.Tooltip.js
36 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
31 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
39 ms
front.js
40 ms
hsf4kam.js
212 ms
style.css
39 ms
script.js
41 ms
signup-form.css
150 ms
signup-form.js
165 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
28 ms
gprofiles.js
71 ms
wpgroho.js
38 ms
masonry.min.js
39 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
38 ms
functions.js
38 ms
e-201611.js
34 ms
style.css
22 ms
1f
120 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
logo-v2.png
29 ms
css
66 ms
dotted-line.png
22 ms
justoneoftheboysmoodboard.jpg
38 ms
coutureclubmoodboard.jpg
44 ms
hottropicsmoodboard.jpg
39 ms
naturewatchmoodboard.jpg
44 ms
paradiselostmoodboard.jpg
41 ms
patternmixupmoodboard.jpg
39 ms
justoneoftheboysmoodboard.jpg
38 ms
coutureclubmoodboard.jpg
39 ms
hottropicsmoodboard.jpg
40 ms
naturewatchmoodboard.jpg
41 ms
paradiselostmoodboard.jpg
40 ms
patternmixupmoodboard.jpg
40 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
18 ms
collect
98 ms
hovercard.css
27 ms
services.css
53 ms
g.gif
3 ms
design-options.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
design-options.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
design-options.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
KO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Design-options.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Korean is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Design-options.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
design-options.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Design Options. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: