2.5 sec in total
250 ms
2 sec
271 ms
Click here to check amazing DIAL content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dial.de
We develop the lighting design software DIALux, offer further training in the Academy, are the publisher of Lightshift and measure products in the lighting laboratory.
Visit dial.deWe analyzed Dial.de page load time and found that the first response time was 250 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
dial.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.245
51/100
15%
Value7.9 s
44/100
10%
250 ms
288 ms
194 ms
312 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Dial.de, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.dial.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) belongs to the original domain Dial.de.
Page size can be reduced by 726.5 kB (62%)
1.2 MB
442.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Dial.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 565.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DIAL needs image optimization as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 386.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 386.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 263.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dial.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 263.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (52%)
52
25
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DIAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dial.de
250 ms
288 ms
stylesheet_d3e4e2bc04.css
194 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
312 ms
hoverIntent-1.7.5.js
208 ms
superfish-1.7.5.min.js
208 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
435 ms
layout_2col_right_31.css
222 ms
templateedit.css
287 ms
slightbox.css
309 ms
slimbox.2.0.4.yui.js
328 ms
piwik.js
327 ms
slim_base.css
110 ms
nav_superfish.css
96 ms
basemod.css
111 ms
basemod_2col_right_31.css
102 ms
content.css
105 ms
typo3-RTE.css
104 ms
print_003.css
191 ms
css
23 ms
print_base.css
109 ms
DIAL.png
109 ms
down.gif
98 ms
suche.png
113 ms
search.gif
102 ms
WHY-Header_DE.jpg
206 ms
house.gif
104 ms
download.png
193 ms
seminar.png
204 ms
pdf.png
206 ms
blog.png
215 ms
DxNewsApp.png
235 ms
mail_icon_01.png
286 ms
fb_tw_yt.png
307 ms
DIAL_Website-St%C3%B6rer-Messe2016_neu.png
433 ms
Preview_Blog_120x120.jpg
430 ms
Perdix1.jpg
430 ms
Light_Building_News.jpg
442 ms
f6af5495be.jpg
431 ms
770f66c92d.jpg
432 ms
Paradin1_02.jpg
433 ms
E2Y1.jpg
439 ms
c63c0ba65a.jpg
477 ms
20f2fd4017.png
512 ms
LEDORA1.jpg
512 ms
stoerer.png
512 ms
Stoerer-Close.png
542 ms
dkcRmU2VFck
125 ms
bullet.gif
473 ms
house.gif
472 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
70 ms
www-embed-player.js
90 ms
base.js
161 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
24 ms
ad_status.js
56 ms
Stoerer.png
103 ms
house.gif
109 ms
dial.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dial.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
dial.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dial.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Dial.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dial.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DIAL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: