5.9 sec in total
472 ms
5 sec
390 ms
Welcome to diazoom.com homepage info - get ready to check Diazoom best content right away, or after learning these important things about diazoom.com
Visit diazoom.comWe analyzed Diazoom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 472 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
diazoom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
472 ms
1175 ms
934 ms
676 ms
568 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Diazoom.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Smbaski.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Smbaski.com.
Page size can be reduced by 713.5 kB (20%)
3.6 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Diazoom.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Diazoom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 258.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 258.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Diazoom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (22%)
50
39
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Diazoom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
diazoom.com
472 ms
www.diazoom.com
1175 ms
bootstrap.min.css
934 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
676 ms
style.css
568 ms
css
23 ms
css
37 ms
jquery.js
991 ms
bootstrap.min.js
280 ms
slide1.jpg
2449 ms
bg.jpg
722 ms
flyer.png
822 ms
ico_appStore.png
205 ms
ico_googlePlau.png
140 ms
logo_footer.png
204 ms
logo.png
322 ms
kalps.png
610 ms
icon_search.png
332 ms
icon_kampanya.png
333 ms
pin_promocin.png
417 ms
ping_fonStop.png
466 ms
sevgililer-gunu15x151.jpg
468 ms
dogum-gunu15x151.jpg
553 ms
bebek15x151.jpg
614 ms
evlilik15x151.jpg
615 ms
is-dunyasi15x151.jpg
687 ms
portfolyo15x151.jpg
759 ms
tatil15x151.jpg
766 ms
installments.jpg
756 ms
icon_footer1.png
824 ms
icon_footer2.png
860 ms
icon_footer3.png
902 ms
icon_footer4.png
909 ms
paymentIcos.jpg
905 ms
slide2.jpg
1808 ms
slide3.jpg
2755 ms
pLvOnKLTSDE
104 ms
slide1.jpg
943 ms
footer_share_facebook.png
938 ms
footer_share_twitter.png
976 ms
footer_share_instagram.png
1022 ms
footer_share_pinterest.png
1023 ms
footer_miniContact3.png
1036 ms
footer_miniContact2.png
1068 ms
footer_miniContact1.png
1072 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
16 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
25 ms
www-embed-player.js
47 ms
base.js
87 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
47 ms
ad_status.js
39 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
63 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
62 ms
diazoom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
diazoom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
diazoom.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Diazoom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Diazoom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
diazoom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Diazoom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: