2.8 sec in total
125 ms
2.3 sec
336 ms
Visit digitaldoughnut.report now to see the best up-to-date Digital Doughnut content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitaldoughnut.report
Join the Largest Digital and Marketing Community in the World
Visit digitaldoughnut.reportWe analyzed Digitaldoughnut.report page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
digitaldoughnut.report performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value1,290 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.215
58/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
125 ms
82 ms
103 ms
99 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Digitaldoughnut.report, 45% (30 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 36% (24 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (685 ms) relates to the external source Frog.wix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (68%)
3.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Digitaldoughnut.report main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 132.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digital Doughnut needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.9 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitaldoughnut.report needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (56%)
64
28
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Doughnut. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
digitaldoughnut.report
125 ms
www.digitaldoughnut.report
82 ms
bt
103 ms
require.min.js
99 ms
main-r.min.js
112 ms
viewer.css
141 ms
ugc-viewer
52 ms
dynamicmodel
16 ms
df7f68_b4f71086184b3698d00837ef0beff5fc_319.json.z
158 ms
df7f68_b75a9a2f7be40bebcd442f56e3167b5b_306.json.z
147 ms
bt
67 ms
skins.min.js
124 ms
components.min.js
125 ms
utils.min.js
55 ms
core.min.js
115 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
108 ms
lodash.min.js
103 ms
TweenMax.min.js
108 ms
layout.min.js
127 ms
tpa.min.js
130 ms
fonts.min.js
424 ms
animations.min.js
126 ms
swfobject.min.js
125 ms
mousetrap.min.js
124 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
436 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
433 ms
react-dom.min.js
432 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
429 ms
widgets.min.js
430 ms
experiment.js
435 ms
render.min.js
432 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
438 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
435 ms
zepto.min.js
429 ms
color.min.js
430 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
130 ms
bt
217 ms
bt
685 ms
latin.css
610 ms
dc.js
677 ms
df7f68_1137c0e6efd3486791f2b85d7c55a396.png
460 ms
df7f68_95ca71b1a1fa4ff1a35b722c3cfe4676.png
148 ms
f61c7a3b4b4947b28511a25034973383.png
125 ms
e0678ef25486466ba65ef6ad47b559e1.png
148 ms
c4392d634a0148fda8b7b2b0ad98293b.png
149 ms
e9bb463a1bc4434c9d33b81b1fe937f5.png
158 ms
df7f68_3437b319b0db4089b3ed8a95b7c26e13.png
255 ms
df7f68_938496bdc7054d188d0521aeea62ed99.png
259 ms
df7f68_9d731ca34aa34e6fb25dc4a499bc97f8.png
159 ms
df7f68_0609d12d6c1d4f26891aba0f6dc080fb.png
252 ms
df7f68_0bd1c34a537b44738948d9d5b4ec1018.png
255 ms
df7f68_4bc846ba1fdc432db9a83a1e5df5bf83.png
254 ms
df7f68_ec943169964f4960a009c446c14d469d.png
256 ms
df7f68_2bad32c4af3b4a9dbb05187c447555f4.png
265 ms
df7f68_29d127d202c246ceb9af5aa9d1a65539.png
259 ms
df7f68_54d0aa5b24ea4e81b3cbc1ebdda8aee6.png
257 ms
df7f68_7c837a4374814b8bad966bdc218dc40e.png
260 ms
df7f68_555e9a441aa74d4da4529724525f2352.png
257 ms
df7f68_e84f437e530d4be893e9a7427afc43a0.png
261 ms
df7f68_283f59ce85f64f92b19c65b5267b9d0c.png
261 ms
df7f68_80c96feb05d144f8ba0904717fabdf69.png
264 ms
df7f68_f9c454eec72a406b9a99e2b3a1ca8262.png
263 ms
bt
140 ms
bt
140 ms
bt
244 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff
123 ms
digitaldoughnut.report accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
digitaldoughnut.report best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
digitaldoughnut.report SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitaldoughnut.report can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Digitaldoughnut.report main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitaldoughnut.report
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digital Doughnut. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: