8 sec in total
3.2 sec
4.4 sec
343 ms
Visit digitalzoomstudio.net now to see the best up-to-date Digital Zoom Studio content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitalzoomstudio.net
Building the web
Visit digitalzoomstudio.netWe analyzed Digitalzoomstudio.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
digitalzoomstudio.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
3174 ms
384 ms
116 ms
114 ms
146 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalzoomstudio.net, 8% (8 requests) were made to Preview-cc.s3.envato.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitalzoomstudio.net.
Page size can be reduced by 714.9 kB (65%)
1.1 MB
379.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Digitalzoomstudio.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 627.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digital Zoom Studio needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 415.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 415.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 209.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalzoomstudio.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (54%)
105
48
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Zoom Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digitalzoomstudio.net
3174 ms
style.css
384 ms
styles.css
116 ms
marketplace.css
114 ms
superfish.css
146 ms
skeleton.css
202 ms
skeleton-responsive.css
165 ms
shortcodes.css
218 ms
plusslider.css
162 ms
stylesheet.css
275 ms
jquery.js
569 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
296 ms
jquery.syntax.min.js
267 ms
javascript.js
274 ms
wp-fixes.css
356 ms
widgets.js
168 ms
all.js
30 ms
prettyPhoto.css
285 ms
tiptip.css
168 ms
jquery.form.min.js
227 ms
scripts.js
208 ms
superfish.js
214 ms
ammon.js
258 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
246 ms
js
69 ms
jquery.quovolver.js
279 ms
tiptip.js
282 ms
totop.js
304 ms
parallax.js
322 ms
jqueryeasing.js
343 ms
jquery.infieldlabel.min.js
350 ms
ga.js
40 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
294 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
dzstest
51 ms
thumb-zoomsounds-audio-player.jpg
201 ms
logo2.png
212 ms
onlylogo.png
194 ms
menu-separator.png
194 ms
shadow-down.png
193 ms
login.png
193 ms
social-icons.png
193 ms
twitter.png
193 ms
facebook.png
268 ms
search-loupe.png
267 ms
bg-slider.png
267 ms
shadow-up.png
267 ms
bg-gradient.png
267 ms
1.__large_preview-145x145.jpg
268 ms
preview-parallaxer-145x145.jpg
345 ms
Screen-Shot-2014-10-12-at-5.14.54-PM-145x145.png
346 ms
wordpress-visual-editor-145x145.jpg
345 ms
preview-video-player-with-builder-145x145.jpg
344 ms
menu-bullet.png
343 ms
map_pin_stroke_12x12.png
344 ms
bg-testimonals-pin.png
434 ms
twitter-bird-icon.png
403 ms
thumb-wpzoomtimeline.jpg
205 ms
thumb-wpzoomtimeline.jpg
207 ms
thumb-zoomtimeline.jpg
209 ms
thumb-jquery-layouter.jpg
207 ms
thumb-parallaxer-wordpress.jpg
260 ms
thumb-wordpress-layouter.jpg
205 ms
thumb-parallaxer.jpg
208 ms
CartoGothicStd-Book-webfont.woff
449 ms
login
16 ms
287 ms
302 ms
live-comments-icon.png
367 ms
xd_arbiter.php
141 ms
xd_arbiter.php
240 ms
close.png
371 ms
map-shadows.png
363 ms
closeMap.png
403 ms
totop-arrow.png
411 ms
common.js
93 ms
map.js
93 ms
util.js
184 ms
marker.js
143 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
228 ms
ping
251 ms
providers.css
117 ms
menutouchicon.png
305 ms
comments.php
255 ms
onion.js
25 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
84 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
79 ms
stats.js
14 ms
google.png
49 ms
yahoo.png
55 ms
openid.png
56 ms
twitter_bg.png
55 ms
like.php
85 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
50 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
105 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
67 ms
xYm_UD1pmAz.css
55 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
73 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
86 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
72 ms
jot
103 ms
comments.php
71 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
10 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
16 ms
shadow01.png
84 ms
arrows-ffffff.png
66 ms
digitalzoomstudio.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
digitalzoomstudio.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
digitalzoomstudio.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalzoomstudio.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalzoomstudio.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitalzoomstudio.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digital Zoom Studio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: