7.6 sec in total
483 ms
5.9 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Digixit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digixit.com
Une approche de Conseil en rupture pour conduire avec succès une transformation profonde et urgente de l’entreprise d’aujourd’hui vers le digital.
Visit digixit.comWe analyzed Digixit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 483 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
digixit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value16.2 s
0/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.995
2/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
483 ms
330 ms
336 ms
358 ms
378 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Digixit.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Digixit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 51.2 kB (0%)
13.0 MB
12.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Digixit.com main page is 13.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digixit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digixit.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (68%)
63
20
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digixit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digixit.com
483 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
330 ms
style.min.css
336 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
358 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
378 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
360 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
361 ms
animations.css
650 ms
style.css
669 ms
css
40 ms
search-filter.min.css
683 ms
frontend.css
703 ms
style.css
717 ms
style.css
705 ms
style.min.css
985 ms
css
40 ms
style.min.css
684 ms
style.css
1019 ms
jetpack.css
1091 ms
jquery.min.js
1139 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1038 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
1031 ms
prefixfree.min.js
1298 ms
modernizr.js
1033 ms
search-filter-build.min.js
1626 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
1632 ms
frontend.js
1634 ms
et-core-unified-957-17074499517922.min.css
1638 ms
css
36 ms
photon.min.js
1680 ms
css3-animate-it.js
1694 ms
animator-applier.js
1694 ms
idle-timer.min.js
1636 ms
custom.js
1694 ms
core.min.js
1814 ms
datepicker.min.js
2124 ms
custom.unified.js
2061 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
2035 ms
e-202406.js
21 ms
common.js
2059 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1943 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2023 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1993 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
2045 ms
Logo-with-midle-font.png
405 ms
vision-b-titre.png
107 ms
offre-titre-3.png
106 ms
audace-b-titre.png
103 ms
talent-b-titre.png
104 ms
biotope-b-titre.png
93 ms
titre-agenda.png
127 ms
Logo-with-midle-font.png
1083 ms
titre-contact.png
122 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
preloader.gif
609 ms
perspective-fond.png
1043 ms
maintenant-fond.png
691 ms
fondations-fond.png
1432 ms
contact-fond-2.png
1231 ms
learning-fond.png
1588 ms
biotope-fond-2.png
997 ms
contact-2.png
1791 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff
41 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCM.woff
57 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCM.woff
68 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff
85 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff
84 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff
84 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCM.woff
68 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCM.woff
66 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CM.woff
85 ms
modules.ttf
1537 ms
collect
24 ms
js
183 ms
font
65 ms
digixit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
digixit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
digixit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digixit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Digixit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digixit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digixit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: