4.7 sec in total
270 ms
3.8 sec
545 ms
Click here to check amazing Discuss Diets content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about discussdiets.com
Anti-AgingAnti-Aging7 OffersAppetite SuppressantsAppetite Suppressants3 OffersBelly FatBelly Fat6 OffersBodybuildingBodybuilding8 OffersCleanse DietsCleanse
Visit discussdiets.comWe analyzed Discussdiets.com page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
discussdiets.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.398
25/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
270 ms
1217 ms
267 ms
56 ms
426 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Discussdiets.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Discussdiets.com.
Page size can be reduced by 137.4 kB (19%)
706.0 kB
568.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Discussdiets.com main page is 706.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 448.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Discuss Diets needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discussdiets.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (96%)
89
4
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discuss Diets. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 68 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
discussdiets.com
270 ms
discussdiets.com
1217 ms
style.css
267 ms
slidingpanel.css
56 ms
dynamiccomparison.css
426 ms
style.min.css
407 ms
css
38 ms
style.min.css
386 ms
screen.min.css
69 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
292 ms
animations.min.css
471 ms
frontend.min.css
505 ms
post-2114.css
532 ms
post-551.css
708 ms
eggrehub.css
798 ms
iconstyle.css
794 ms
woocommerce.css
724 ms
quantity.css
741 ms
css
37 ms
jquery.min.js
546 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
561 ms
price_alert.js
576 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
589 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
604 ms
js.cookie.min.js
618 ms
woocommerce.min.js
632 ms
wc-blocks.css
435 ms
filterpanel.css
686 ms
tablechart.js
823 ms
comparechart.js
748 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
765 ms
order-attribution.min.js
951 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
955 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
702 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
712 ms
react.min.js
744 ms
hooks.min.js
763 ms
deprecated.min.js
990 ms
dom.min.js
771 ms
react-dom.min.js
996 ms
escape-html.min.js
785 ms
element.min.js
789 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
762 ms
i18n.min.js
757 ms
keycodes.min.js
1037 ms
priority-queue.min.js
654 ms
compose.min.js
654 ms
private-apis.min.js
620 ms
redux-routine.min.js
598 ms
data.min.js
588 ms
lodash.min.js
588 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
587 ms
url.min.js
586 ms
api-fetch.min.js
598 ms
wc-settings.js
930 ms
data-controls.min.js
868 ms
html-entities.min.js
555 ms
notices.min.js
554 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
517 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
810 ms
dom-ready.min.js
714 ms
a11y.min.js
440 ms
primitives.min.js
346 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
19 ms
warning.min.js
347 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
43 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
45 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
45 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
44 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
46 ms
blocks-components.js
359 ms
blocks-checkout.js
369 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
351 ms
inview.js
347 ms
pgwmodal.js
360 ms
unveil.js
373 ms
hoverintent.js
379 ms
countdown.js
380 ms
custom.js
385 ms
jquery.sticky.js
383 ms
ajaxcart.js
397 ms
quantity.js
736 ms
wishcount.js
380 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
605 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
719 ms
waypoints.min.js
709 ms
core.min.js
661 ms
swiper.min.js
942 ms
share-link.min.js
802 ms
dialog.min.js
873 ms
frontend.min.js
1110 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
900 ms
underscore.min.js
945 ms
wp-util.min.js
1002 ms
frontend.min.js
1080 ms
rhicons.ttf
1346 ms
discuss-diets-logo.png
1104 ms
blank.gif
1290 ms
discussdiets.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
discussdiets.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
discussdiets.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discussdiets.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Discussdiets.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
discussdiets.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: