6.9 sec in total
775 ms
5.9 sec
232 ms
Click here to check amazing Distance Between content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about distancebetween.co.in
DistanceBetween: Find Distance Between Two Cities of India. Shortest Route Places and City Distance Calculator From the Search Engine which helps to Calculate Distance, Travel Time, Driving Directions...
Visit distancebetween.co.inWe analyzed Distancebetween.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 775 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
distancebetween.co.in performance score
775 ms
2593 ms
1332 ms
1042 ms
785 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Distancebetween.co.in, 13% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 10% (5 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Distancebetween.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 606.5 kB (66%)
917.4 kB
310.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Distancebetween.co.in main page is 917.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 609.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Distance Between needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 394.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 175.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Distancebetween.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 175.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (54%)
41
19
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Distance Between. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
distancebetween.co.in
775 ms
www.distancebetween.co.in
2593 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1332 ms
animate.min.css
1042 ms
font-awesome.min.css
785 ms
style.css
522 ms
responsive.css
524 ms
js
26 ms
roadroute_js.js
788 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
1616 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1065 ms
main.js
1039 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
moon_dealform_300x250.gif
148 ms
logo2.png
263 ms
logo.png
518 ms
ajf.php
450 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1023 ms
collect
25 ms
ca-pub-1822252947937694.js
38 ms
zrt_lookup.html
34 ms
show_ads_impl.js
49 ms
ads
239 ms
osd.js
12 ms
ads
377 ms
ads
350 ms
ads
167 ms
ajf.php
323 ms
14335356835040511619
31 ms
abg.js
36 ms
m_js_controller.js
44 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
72 ms
s
20 ms
x_button_blue2.png
21 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
3 ms
adlib.min.js
50 ms
ajs.php
444 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
767 ms
ajf.php
266 ms
ajf.php
371 ms
common.js
11 ms
util.js
11 ms
controls.js
12 ms
places_impl.js
11 ms
lg.php
439 ms
powered-by-google-on-white3.png
36 ms
autocomplete-icons.png
50 ms
distancebetween.co.in SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Distancebetween.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Distancebetween.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
distancebetween.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Distance Between. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: