20.5 sec in total
8.2 sec
12 sec
239 ms
Click here to check amazing Distance Between Places content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about distancebetweenplaces.net
Let's calculate driving and flight distance and time with our website and travel around the world.
Visit distancebetweenplaces.netWe analyzed Distancebetweenplaces.net page load time and found that the first response time was 8.2 sec and then it took 12.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
distancebetweenplaces.net performance score
8223 ms
2142 ms
2796 ms
38 ms
7 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Distancebetweenplaces.net, 58% (33 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Distancebetweenplaces.net.
Page size can be reduced by 470.4 kB (61%)
765.6 kB
295.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Distancebetweenplaces.net main page is 765.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 614.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Distance Between Places images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 408.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 408.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Distancebetweenplaces.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (41%)
51
30
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Distance Between Places. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
distancebetweenplaces.net
8223 ms
basic.css
2142 ms
tabs.css
2796 ms
js
38 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
logo.gif
436 ms
ca-pub-7294748932400245.js
46 ms
zrt_lookup.html
36 ms
show_ads_impl.js
58 ms
hit
269 ms
osd.js
16 ms
common.js
21 ms
map.js
19 ms
util.js
76 ms
geometry.js
74 ms
directions.js
76 ms
onion.js
25 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
79 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
70 ms
stats.js
65 ms
controls.js
61 ms
infowindow.js
34 ms
css
97 ms
marker.js
27 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
131 ms
DirectionsService.Route
146 ms
transparent.png
93 ms
google4.png
33 ms
mapcnt6.png
19 ms
sv5.png
29 ms
vt
20 ms
vt
18 ms
vt
19 ms
vt
20 ms
vt
25 ms
vt
27 ms
vt
49 ms
vt
48 ms
vt
47 ms
vt
49 ms
vt
50 ms
vt
50 ms
vt
50 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
51 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
21 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
43 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
45 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
43 ms
poly.js
37 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf&color=ff333333&ax=44&ay=48&scale=1
60 ms
maneuvers.png
54 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf&color=ff333333&ax=44&ay=48&scale=1
52 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
106 ms
vt
34 ms
undo_poly.png
33 ms
distancebetweenplaces.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Distancebetweenplaces.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Distancebetweenplaces.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
distancebetweenplaces.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Distance Between Places. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: