2.2 sec in total
419 ms
1.5 sec
248 ms
Click here to check amazing Downtimechecker content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about downtimechecker.com
Website downtime or uptime right now? Is this website downtime for everyone or just me?
Visit downtimechecker.comWe analyzed Downtimechecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 419 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
downtimechecker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
419 ms
6 ms
24 ms
26 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 140 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Downtimechecker.com, 6% (8 requests) were made to S.downuptime.net and 5% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 622.7 kB (57%)
1.1 MB
471.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Downtimechecker.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 829.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Downtimechecker needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 489.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 489.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Downtimechecker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 111 (80%)
138
27
The browser has sent 138 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Downtimechecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
downuptime.net
419 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
core.js
24 ms
jquery.sticky.js
26 ms
style.css
34 ms
adsbygoogle.js
23 ms
ca-pub-5613914601213865.js
47 ms
zrt_lookup.html
56 ms
show_ads_impl.js
83 ms
favicons
33 ms
favicons
32 ms
favicons
36 ms
favicons
33 ms
favicons
35 ms
favicons
133 ms
favicons
34 ms
favicons
36 ms
favicons
39 ms
favicons
37 ms
favicons
136 ms
sprite.png
25 ms
favicons
22 ms
favicons
22 ms
favicons
22 ms
favicons
23 ms
favicons
117 ms
favicons
25 ms
favicons
133 ms
favicons
31 ms
favicons
131 ms
favicons
140 ms
favicons
116 ms
favicons
120 ms
favicons
118 ms
favicons
163 ms
favicons
119 ms
favicons
119 ms
favicons
124 ms
favicons
122 ms
favicons
153 ms
favicons
124 ms
favicons
97 ms
favicons
98 ms
favicons
119 ms
favicons
99 ms
bookmarklet-button.png
75 ms
favicons
87 ms
favicons
88 ms
favicons
89 ms
favicons
91 ms
favicons
91 ms
favicons
93 ms
favicons
95 ms
favicons
94 ms
favicons
96 ms
favicons
97 ms
favicons
98 ms
favicons
99 ms
favicons
100 ms
favicons
103 ms
favicons
102 ms
favicons
101 ms
ads
154 ms
favicons
50 ms
favicons
50 ms
favicons
50 ms
favicons
48 ms
favicons
82 ms
favicons
47 ms
favicons
47 ms
osd.js
62 ms
favicons
72 ms
favicons
60 ms
favicons
81 ms
favicons
65 ms
favicons
73 ms
favicons
52 ms
favicons
53 ms
favicons
53 ms
favicons
53 ms
favicons
53 ms
favicons
52 ms
favicons
52 ms
favicons
51 ms
favicons
50 ms
favicons
50 ms
favicons
51 ms
favicons
51 ms
favicons
51 ms
favicons
51 ms
favicons
49 ms
favicons
50 ms
Check-Page-Rank-Free.png
39 ms
infolinks_main.js
78 ms
favicons
43 ms
favicons
42 ms
favicons
43 ms
favicons
46 ms
favicons
45 ms
feed-icon.png
42 ms
twitter-icon.png
43 ms
facebook-logo.png
45 ms
ads
219 ms
ads
287 ms
user_sync.html
23 ms
usersyncup-an.html
97 ms
ice.js
173 ms
all.js
288 ms
addthis_widget.js
23 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
m_js_controller.js
94 ms
abg.js
104 ms
showad.js
76 ms
PugMaster
52 ms
collect
55 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
109 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
43 ms
s
32 ms
x_button_blue2.png
116 ms
pixel
139 ms
Pug
131 ms
usersync.aspx
127 ms
14588136508991
114 ms
17013349648600926362
75 ms
Pug
81 ms
Pug
81 ms
Pug
73 ms
Pug
72 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
65 ms
Pug
80 ms
Pug
78 ms
449 ms
mapuid
102 ms
FBLIS.html
100 ms
doq.htm
78 ms
xd_arbiter.php
382 ms
xd_arbiter.php
465 ms
sdk.js
347 ms
loader.gif
329 ms
loader-bg.png
52 ms
downtimechecker.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
downtimechecker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
downtimechecker.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Downtimechecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Downtimechecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
downtimechecker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Downtimechecker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: