9.5 sec in total
2.9 sec
6.1 sec
530 ms
Visit file.danafa.com now to see the best up-to-date File DANAFA content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about file.danafa.com
این فروشگاه فایل وابسطه به سیستم همکاری در فروش دانافا می باشد و تمام سعی خود را می
Visit file.danafa.comWe analyzed File.danafa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
file.danafa.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.364
29/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
2875 ms
172 ms
160 ms
165 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original File.danafa.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Webgozar.ir and 1% (1 request) were made to Opi.yahoo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain File.danafa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 486.3 kB (43%)
1.1 MB
642.3 kB
In fact, the total size of File.danafa.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 602.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. File DANAFA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. File.danafa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (42%)
89
52
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File DANAFA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
file.danafa.com
2875 ms
common.css
172 ms
style.css
160 ms
style-rtl.css
165 ms
default.css
168 ms
k2.css
173 ms
normalize.css
173 ms
layout.css
236 ms
joomla.css
236 ms
system.css
237 ms
template.css
249 ms
menu.css
243 ms
font-awesome.css
243 ms
kh.stuff.css
309 ms
style1.css
315 ms
css3.css
312 ms
menucss3.css
327 ms
movefrom.css
328 ms
typography.style1.css
333 ms
typography.iconset.style1.css
386 ms
stylesheet.css
387 ms
stylesheet.css
385 ms
stylesheet.css
400 ms
stylesheet.css
401 ms
style.css
413 ms
module.css
457 ms
allmode-default.css
464 ms
style3.css
465 ms
style.css
478 ms
mootools-core.js
561 ms
kh.scripts.js
493 ms
kh.menu.js
529 ms
engine.js
537 ms
engine.mootools.js
537 ms
engine.js
552 ms
zistyle.css
611 ms
c.aspx
144 ms
71376untitled-5.png
183 ms
imgsize.php
172 ms
imgsize.php
1167 ms
imgsize.php
1204 ms
imgsize.php
1196 ms
online
149 ms
kh_persian-gulf.jpg
139 ms
social_icons.png
171 ms
topmenu_icons.png
347 ms
menu_dropdown_dropdown.png
345 ms
imgsize.php
347 ms
imgsize.php
348 ms
imgsize.php
1311 ms
imgsize.php
355 ms
imgsize.php
439 ms
imgsize.php
439 ms
imgsize.php
481 ms
imgsize.php
511 ms
right.gif
708 ms
imgsize.php
596 ms
imgsize.php
683 ms
imgsize.php
770 ms
imgsize.php
792 ms
imgsize.php
855 ms
imgsize.php
877 ms
imgsize.php
942 ms
imgsize.php
967 ms
imgsize.php
1026 ms
imgsize.php
1045 ms
imgsize.php
1504 ms
imgsize.php
1153 ms
imgsize.php
1329 ms
av.png
1232 ms
48174zaban-engilisi.size2.jpg
1318 ms
46638shimi.size2.jpg
1320 ms
25460arayeha.size2.jpg
1305 ms
51944hendese.size2.jpg
1352 ms
64501r.fizik.size2.jpg
1262 ms
BYekan-webfont.woff
1349 ms
fontawesome-webfont3294.woff
1369 ms
SEgoeui-webfont.woff
1700 ms
58327dini.size2.jpg
1128 ms
79379zaban-farsi.size2.jpg
1316 ms
54256riazi.size2.jpg
1321 ms
namad1.png
1308 ms
link.png
1306 ms
mod_box_header.png
1225 ms
interface.png
1225 ms
xstat.aspx
171 ms
bubble.png
1186 ms
time.png
1156 ms
bottom.png
1069 ms
small.desktop.css
136 ms
tablet.css
115 ms
small.tablet.css
87 ms
mobile.css
88 ms
file.danafa.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
file.danafa.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
file.danafa.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
FA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise File.danafa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Persian language. Our system also found out that File.danafa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
file.danafa.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File DANAFA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: