3.4 sec in total
112 ms
3 sec
287 ms
Visit e-gmat.com now to see the best up-to-date E Gmat content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e-gmat.com
Start Learning Right Away IT'S FREE 25 concepts in the free trial 5X more Effective than a book Diagnostic Test &helip;
Visit e-gmat.comWe analyzed E-gmat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
e-gmat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value4,940 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.998
2/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
112 ms
439 ms
56 ms
69 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original E-gmat.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain E-gmat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 888.1 kB (60%)
1.5 MB
600.8 kB
In fact, the total size of E-gmat.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 842.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, E Gmat needs image optimization as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 579.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 579.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 203.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-gmat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (56%)
99
44
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Gmat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
e-gmat.com
112 ms
e-gmat.com
439 ms
css
56 ms
css
69 ms
css
82 ms
analytics_codes.js
116 ms
km_event_fire.js
126 ms
styles.css
156 ms
popup-contact-form.css
129 ms
css
84 ms
genericons.css
131 ms
style.css
198 ms
wp-paginate.css
271 ms
jquery.js
309 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
popup-contact-form.js
270 ms
popup-contact-popup.js
290 ms
colorbox.css
332 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
382 ms
diggdigg-style.css
387 ms
prettyPhoto.css
387 ms
ui.totop.css
405 ms
icourses.css
429 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
486 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
505 ms
iview.js
506 ms
contentslider.js
505 ms
expand.js
515 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
549 ms
raphael-min.js
641 ms
jquery.easing.js
608 ms
small_tab.js
608 ms
jquery.sticky.js
612 ms
scrollIt.js
629 ms
jquery-ui.js
796 ms
fbds.js
124 ms
goal.min.js
92 ms
analytics.js
104 ms
i.js
87 ms
78108e2d51af70e55823aceb1937f2099ee4fe94.2.js
147 ms
collect
36 ms
collect
95 ms
53 ms
e
49 ms
e
46 ms
ga-audiences
34 ms
pop_img.png
172 ms
pop_close.jpg
170 ms
pop_img1.jpg
165 ms
h_bg.jpg
143 ms
logo.png
146 ms
sing.png
148 ms
slider_bg.jpg
258 ms
ps2.png
261 ms
ps4.png
272 ms
ps5.png
270 ms
ps3.png
268 ms
left_ov.png
373 ms
ov_bg.jpg
376 ms
arrow_right.png
377 ms
its_hover_1.png
381 ms
ov_arrow.png
383 ms
right_ov.png
386 ms
shadow.png
561 ms
t1.png
489 ms
t2.png
490 ms
t3.png
493 ms
t4.png
496 ms
aroow_down.png
494 ms
signup_now.png
603 ms
watch_bg.jpg
602 ms
cr_bp.png
680 ms
sc_vm.png
681 ms
s_bg_r.jpg
610 ms
s_bg.jpg
676 ms
arr_left.jpg
716 ms
arr_bg.jpg
717 ms
right_b.jpg
723 ms
t_up_shadow.jpg
790 ms
arr_right.jpg
793 ms
shadow1_bg.jpg
794 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
67 ms
9Un71ABfeNOHeQITcqWzew.ttf
78 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
88 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
101 ms
tes_bg.png
695 ms
testimonials.png
696 ms
shadow2_bg.jpg
696 ms
lat_bg.png
753 ms
date_bg_3.png
758 ms
incl_nav_3.jpg
760 ms
incl_nav_2.jpg
700 ms
incl_nav_1.jpg
700 ms
incl_nav_9.jpg
696 ms
incl_nav_4.jpg
755 ms
free.gif
766 ms
cal_bg.png
763 ms
footer_bg1.jpg
705 ms
start_hover.png
704 ms
footer_bg3.jpg
702 ms
footerbg2.jpg
757 ms
border.png
762 ms
controls.png
762 ms
ui.totop.png
785 ms
undefined
1077 ms
roundtrip.js
30 ms
3 ms
e-gmat.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
e-gmat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
e-gmat.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-gmat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that E-gmat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
e-gmat.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E Gmat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: