7.9 sec in total
240 ms
6.4 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to e2e.us homepage info - get ready to check E 2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about e2e.us
e2e Logistics Consulting offers the top software for the logistics industry, with systems handling top importers, exporters, shippers and forwarders worldwide.
Visit e2e.usWe analyzed E2e.us page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
e2e.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
240 ms
260 ms
119 ms
145 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original E2e.us, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (957 ms) belongs to the original domain E2e.us.
Page size can be reduced by 160.0 kB (14%)
1.2 MB
991.8 kB
In fact, the total size of E2e.us main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E 2 images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (80%)
46
9
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.e2e.us
240 ms
da14ab871918dc4be8046b86c7e6f35a.css
260 ms
post-6720.css
119 ms
post-40.css
145 ms
post-101.css
141 ms
post-177.css
139 ms
post-105.css
138 ms
gravityforms.min.js
181 ms
underscore.min.js
204 ms
frontend.min.js
944 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
231 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
937 ms
dom-ready.min.js
195 ms
hooks.min.js
222 ms
i18n.min.js
223 ms
a11y.min.js
928 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
930 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
926 ms
script.js
928 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
930 ms
url-polyfill.min.js
929 ms
akismet-frontend.js
930 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
932 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
933 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
933 ms
frontend.min.js
930 ms
waypoints.min.js
933 ms
core.min.js
943 ms
swiper.min.js
957 ms
share-link.min.js
946 ms
dialog.min.js
947 ms
frontend.min.js
926 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
936 ms
jet-elements.min.js
931 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
925 ms
css
86 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
927 ms
wp-util.min.js
851 ms
frontend.min.js
851 ms
flatpickr.min.js
852 ms
logo.png
163 ms
e2e-masthead.jpg
627 ms
Logistics.jpg
526 ms
import-export-software.jpg
528 ms
ibm-iseries.png
596 ms
home-businessman-img.jpg
525 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiA.ttf
301 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiA.ttf
300 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiA.ttf
386 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4AQ.ttf
386 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiA.ttf
387 ms
home-bg-1.jpg
575 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
173 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
121 ms
jupiterx.woff
120 ms
e2e.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
e2e.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
e2e.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E2e.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E2e.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
e2e.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E 2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: