4 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.4 sec
232 ms
Visit eagleonline.com now to see the best up-to-date Eagleonline content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eagleonline.com
With S.i. Systems IT staffing, Canada firms and tech professionals get work done and get ahead. Get connected to S.i. today.
Visit eagleonline.comWe analyzed Eagleonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
eagleonline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value3.9 s
52/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
1364 ms
31 ms
118 ms
120 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Eagleonline.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Eagleonline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 773.7 kB (63%)
1.2 MB
448.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Eagleonline.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 686.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eagleonline images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 459.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 459.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 259.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eagleonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 259.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (71%)
84
24
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eagleonline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eagleonline.com
1364 ms
ga.js
31 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
118 ms
style.css
120 ms
css
42 ms
genericons.css
123 ms
font-awesome.min.css
120 ms
default-style.css
156 ms
styles.css
103 ms
templates.css
147 ms
frontend.css
150 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
153 ms
gce-style.css
147 ms
style.css
188 ms
easy-twitter-feed-widget.css
192 ms
jetpack.css
210 ms
tweets.css
187 ms
underscore.min.js
193 ms
jquery.js
254 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
214 ms
backbone.min.js
225 ms
eagledefault.js
237 ms
buttons.js
6 ms
translator-dropdown-m.css
220 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
lib.js
205 ms
main.js
234 ms
jquery.form.min.js
221 ms
scripts.js
232 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
259 ms
gce-script.js
238 ms
jstree.min.js
277 ms
jstree.state.js
257 ms
public.js
261 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
58 ms
gprofiles.js
53 ms
wpgroho.js
261 ms
functions.js
268 ms
widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js
286 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
303 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
style.css
235 ms
best-workplace-en.png
54 ms
top-header-logo.png
36 ms
eagle-logo.png
34 ms
rss.png
34 ms
twitter-logo.png
34 ms
ajax-refresh-icon.gif
36 ms
plus.png
35 ms
100.png
147 ms
minus.png
53 ms
most-admired-en.png
164 ms
ISO-90012008-Registered-Logo-en.png
147 ms
best-managed-company-en.gif
166 ms
best-managed-company-fr.gif
147 ms
ISO-90012008-Registered-Logo-fr.png
165 ms
most-admired-fr.png
165 ms
gtm.js
146 ms
icon-sprites.png
44 ms
header_6.jpg
140 ms
Roboto-Light-webfont.woff
131 ms
Roboto-Black-webfont.woff
113 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
158 ms
widgets.js
110 ms
translator-dropdown.js
139 ms
hovercard.css
96 ms
services.css
104 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
65 ms
bg.png
50 ms
ajax-refresh.gif
50 ms
g.gif
16 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
collect
16 ms
getSegment.php
151 ms
checkOAuth.esi
4 ms
loading-m.gif
28 ms
t.dhj
35 ms
t.dhj
25 ms
cm
29 ms
17 ms
s-3271.xgi
9 ms
hbpix
35 ms
4 ms
pixel
22 ms
pixel
19 ms
2981
23 ms
xrefid.xgi
4 ms
eagleonline.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eagleonline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
eagleonline.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eagleonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eagleonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eagleonline.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eagleonline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: