Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 42

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

241 ms

easyrack.org screenshot

About Website

Visit easyrack.org now to see the best up-to-date Easyrack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about easyrack.org

Easy Rack carries a wide range of material handling equipment including mezzanine shelving systems, pallet racks & jacks, gantry & jib cranes, ladders and industrial - commercial warehouse bulk storag...

Visit easyrack.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Easyrack.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

easyrack.org performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

easyrack.org

1213 ms

DM_redirect.js

70 ms

stylesheet.css

111 ms

lightbox.css

113 ms

addthis_widget.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Easyrack.org, 16% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Easyrack.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 342.3 kB (61%)

Content Size

556.8 kB

After Optimization

214.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Easyrack.org main page is 556.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 406.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 82.7 kB

  • Original 109.8 kB
  • After minification 106.8 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 704 B

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Easyrack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 251.6 kB

  • Original 406.7 kB
  • After minification 406.7 kB
  • After compression 155.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.6 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 9.2 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Easyrack.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (58%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Easyrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

easyrack.org accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

easyrack.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

easyrack.org SEO score

42

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Easyrack.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Easyrack.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Easyrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: