5.9 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.2 sec
142 ms
Welcome to easytrack.at homepage info - get ready to check Easytrack best content for Austria right away, or after learning these important things about easytrack.at
GPS Tracker ✓ elektronisches Fahrtenbuch ✓ GPS Fahrzeugortung und Flottenmanagement Lösungen ✓ GPS Ortung ✓ Routenhistorie ✓ Diebstahlschutz ✓ Telematik
Visit easytrack.atWe analyzed Easytrack.at page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
easytrack.at performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value5.7 s
50/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
1573 ms
118 ms
230 ms
228 ms
225 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Easytrack.at, 4% (3 requests) were made to Yildiz.at.w0121866.kasserver.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Easytrack.at.
Page size can be reduced by 891.9 kB (29%)
3.1 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Easytrack.at main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 311.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Easytrack needs image optimization as it can save up to 311.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 376.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 376.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Easytrack.at needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (70%)
71
21
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Easytrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
easytrack.at
1573 ms
style.css
118 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
230 ms
responsiveslides.css
228 ms
skin.css
225 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
230 ms
responsive.css
232 ms
style.php
1184 ms
style-colors.php
1319 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
343 ms
dashicons.min.css
445 ms
desktop_style.css
340 ms
styles.css
347 ms
settings.css
461 ms
captions.php
1452 ms
jquery.js
584 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
561 ms
front_end_script.js
579 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
683 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
806 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
699 ms
responsiveslides.js
802 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
814 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
919 ms
mfn-offer-slider.js
923 ms
mfn-menu.js
928 ms
portfolio.js
1038 ms
scripts.js
1039 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1049 ms
scripts.js
1153 ms
core.min.js
1155 ms
widget.min.js
1169 ms
mouse.min.js
1270 ms
sortable.min.js
1276 ms
tabs.min.js
1290 ms
accordion.min.js
1285 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1389 ms
base.css
1292 ms
skeleton.css
1191 ms
layout.css
1193 ms
variables.css
1209 ms
shortcodes.css
1295 ms
font-awesome.css
1294 ms
custom.css
1190 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
1193 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
1203 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1125 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
118 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
121 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
119 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
118 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
unnamed-1.png
341 ms
yd-feature-1.png
530 ms
slider-vorteile2-1.png
440 ms
yd-feature-3.png
641 ms
yd-feature-4.png
658 ms
1.png
870 ms
facebook.png
163 ms
googleplus.png
164 ms
container_shadow_960.png
162 ms
Easy-Track-Slider-526x296.png
231 ms
Easy-Track-Slider-82x46.png
193 ms
slider-2-526x368.png
882 ms
slider-2-71x50.png
248 ms
slider-31-526x368.png
675 ms
slider-31-71x50.png
309 ms
slider-1-526x368.png
671 ms
slider-1-71x50.png
365 ms
klimaaktiv.png
422 ms
collect
102 ms
collect
69 ms
ga-audiences
39 ms
easytrack.at accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
easytrack.at best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
easytrack.at SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Easytrack.at can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Easytrack.at main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
easytrack.at
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Easytrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: