2.8 sec in total
248 ms
1.6 sec
909 ms
Click here to check amazing Easy Week content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about easyweek.io
Software and app for appointment booking, time or object reservation with advanced automation and marketing capabilities.
Visit easyweek.ioWe analyzed Easyweek.io page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
easyweek.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value3,790 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
248 ms
523 ms
61 ms
59 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Easyweek.io, 44% (30 requests) were made to Storage.easyweek.io and 26% (18 requests) were made to Cdn.easyweek.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (895 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.easyweek.io.
Page size can be reduced by 157.9 kB (60%)
261.7 kB
103.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Easyweek.io main page is 261.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 219.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 156.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (66%)
56
19
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Easy Week. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
easyweek.io
248 ms
523 ms
gtm.js
61 ms
css
59 ms
css
196 ms
js
79 ms
analytics.js
113 ms
mixpanel-js-wrapper.js
224 ms
fbevents.js
192 ms
user-black.svg
215 ms
interface_en.svg
588 ms
beauty.svg
875 ms
care.svg
895 ms
health.svg
603 ms
auto.svg
606 ms
entertainment.svg
603 ms
education.svg
598 ms
sport.svg
606 ms
animals.svg
611 ms
rent.svg
612 ms
others.svg
611 ms
illustration_1.svg
614 ms
illustration_2.svg
619 ms
illustration_3.svg
620 ms
illustration_4.svg
622 ms
illustration_5.svg
626 ms
illustration_6.svg
642 ms
bg-sts.svg
637 ms
ft1.svg
290 ms
ft2.svg
311 ms
ft3.svg
295 ms
ft4.svg
308 ms
ft5.svg
295 ms
ft6.svg
203 ms
ft7.svg
204 ms
ft8.svg
204 ms
ft9.svg
209 ms
apple_black.svg
206 ms
google_black_fixed.svg
223 ms
huawei-gallery.svg
227 ms
65e9b72df04a1288b7f2.js
300 ms
f922958d0a7e78769e05.js
250 ms
ad4adfb2f91b1b9bebf1.js
375 ms
b07672a97b78147f73d2.js
387 ms
6b94bfabb6713fbf78cc.js
377 ms
76fdca97414ae954ba3f.js
382 ms
a7243f6969740ce8be9c.js
390 ms
9a1b0179850004a7736a.js
412 ms
842506b3e409ec69e500.js
665 ms
459dbceed7f45c66dd3e.js
858 ms
924f345da5a44a528a22.js
629 ms
collect
63 ms
foot-path.svg
397 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrcfJR1Zyc6FYw.ttf
84 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDrcfJR1Zyc6FYw.ttf
352 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrcfJR1Zyc6FYw.ttf
462 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDrcfJR1Zyc6FYw.ttf
279 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrcfJR1Zyc6FYw.ttf
172 ms
GothaProReg.woff
283 ms
GothaProMed.woff
283 ms
GothaProLig.woff
295 ms
GothaProBol.woff
297 ms
GothaProBla.woff
297 ms
collect
44 ms
js
44 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
7 ms
122 ms
ga-audiences
64 ms
easyweek.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
easyweek.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
easyweek.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Easyweek.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Easyweek.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
easyweek.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Easy Week. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: