Tools & Wizards About Us
eatables.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

eatables.in

Page Load Speed

13.3 sec in total

First Response

6.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

155 ms

eatables.in screenshot

About Website

Visit eatables.in now to see the best up-to-date Eatables content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eatables.in

Visit eatables.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Eatables.in page load time and found that the first response time was 6.3 sec and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eatables.in performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.188

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eatables.in

6336 ms

uxcore.css

383 ms

customer-comp.css

9 ms

404_background.jpg

23 ms

uxfont-2.woff

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Eatables.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Eatables.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 186.3 kB (77%)

Content Size

241.4 kB

After Optimization

55.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eatables.in main page is 241.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 195.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 490 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 588 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 490 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 45.1 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eatables needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 170.2 kB

  • Original 195.2 kB
  • After minification 153.7 kB
  • After compression 25.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eatables.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eatables. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

eatables.in

eatables.in

6336 ms

uxcore.css

uxcore.css

383 ms

customer-comp.css

customer-comp.css

9 ms

404_background.jpg

404_background.jpg

23 ms

uxfont-2.woff

uxfont-2.woff

15 ms

uxfont-2.ttf

uxfont-2.ttf

5 ms

Accessibility Review

eatables.in accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

eatables.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

eatables.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eatables.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eatables.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eatables.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eatables. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: