Tools & Wizards About Us
ecm-journal.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

ecm-journal.ru

Важное о цифровизации, электронном документообороте и бизнес-процессах

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

370 ms

ecm-journal.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ecm Journal content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ecm-journal.ru

Обзоры и новости по темам: ECM и BPM, системы электронного документооборота, делопроизводство, архивное дело, цифровые архивы и хранилища, кадровые документы, машиночитаемая доверенность, использовани...

Visit ecm-journal.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Ecm-journal.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ecm-journal.ru performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,730 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.233

54/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ecm-journal.ru

1106 ms

css

29 ms

css

47 ms

all.css

374 ms

all.js

667 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Ecm-journal.ru, 22% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ecm-journal.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.9 kB (37%)

Content Size

440.2 kB

After Optimization

278.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ecm-journal.ru main page is 440.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 242.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 65.1 kB

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 80.1 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 242.4 kB
  • After minification 221.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ecm Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 30.0 kB
  • After minification 27.2 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 82.5 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecm-journal.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (9%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ecm Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ecm-journal.ru

ecm-journal.ru

1106 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

47 ms

all.css

all.css

374 ms

all.js

all.js

667 ms

K88pR3goAWT7BTt32Z01m6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

K88pR3goAWT7BTt32Z01m6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

108 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTWeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTWeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

177 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSmeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSmeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

182 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzGeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzGeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

181 ms

ga.js

ga.js

34 ms

separator-bg-enabled-mirror.png

separator-bg-enabled-mirror.png

172 ms

6861225.jpg

6861225.jpg

984 ms

ecm_j_logo.png

ecm_j_logo.png

172 ms

widget-2.0.js

widget-2.0.js

470 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

162 ms

book_sed.jpg

book_sed.jpg

262 ms

book_ep.jpg

book_ep.jpg

263 ms

book_spec.jpg

book_spec.jpg

268 ms

1646373image001.jpg

1646373image001.jpg

293 ms

icons.png

icons.png

274 ms

6957881image001.jpg

6957881image001.jpg

758 ms

6945366image001.jpg

6945366image001.jpg

562 ms

6946822image001.gif

6946822image001.gif

438 ms

6944008image001.jpg

6944008image001.jpg

444 ms

6915373image001.jpg

6915373image001.jpg

609 ms

quotes.png

quotes.png

455 ms

6952483.gif

6952483.gif

561 ms

ecm_logo.gif

ecm_logo.gif

607 ms

5981822.png

5981822.png

625 ms

3550780.gif

3550780.gif

701 ms

5149674.gif

5149674.gif

823 ms

6912352.jpg

6912352.jpg

1692 ms

5215479.png

5215479.png

837 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

75 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBlwIJl2YiaXHM0xUx_ugXFg.ttf

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBlwIJl2YiaXHM0xUx_ugXFg.ttf

68 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmpz0z5zL8i4lJVsvdmh4hw.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmpz0z5zL8i4lJVsvdmh4hw.ttf

102 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxs48OaV_SNIXktLWq3KXug4.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxs48OaV_SNIXktLWq3KXug4.ttf

99 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxgbEkm-f2UOALJ0ub4PpKrw.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxgbEkm-f2UOALJ0ub4PpKrw.ttf

99 ms

UFoEz2uiuMypUGZL1NKoeg.ttf

UFoEz2uiuMypUGZL1NKoeg.ttf

102 ms

F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

130 ms

providers_ico_sprite.png

providers_ico_sprite.png

649 ms

ecm-logo.png

ecm-logo.png

665 ms

watch.js

watch.js

26 ms

collect

collect

94 ms

ckeditor.js

ckeditor.js

267 ms

Accessibility Review

ecm-journal.ru accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have [alt] text

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ecm-journal.ru best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Registers an unload listener

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ecm-journal.ru SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecm-journal.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ecm-journal.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ecm-journal.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ecm Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: