5.1 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.5 sec
116 ms
Visit eco-joom.com now to see the best up-to-date Eco Joom content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eco-joom.com
Browse our showcase of professional Joomla modules and plugins. More than 100 Joomla modules and plugins are waiting for you.
Visit eco-joom.comWe analyzed Eco-joom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
eco-joom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
1486 ms
417 ms
191 ms
295 ms
197 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Eco-joom.com, 19% (11 requests) were made to Vk.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Eco-joom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (76%)
1.8 MB
430.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Eco-joom.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 877.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 346.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eco Joom needs image optimization as it can save up to 346.6 kB or 77% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 624.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 624.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eco-joom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (62%)
58
22
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eco Joom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eco-joom.com
1486 ms
bootstrap.css
417 ms
system.css
191 ms
template.css
295 ms
custom.css
197 ms
extjoom.css
301 ms
template.css
207 ms
default.css
284 ms
jquery.min.js
777 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
309 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
564 ms
bootstrap.js
720 ms
jquery.tap.min.js
398 ms
script.js
515 ms
menu.js
597 ms
nav-collapse.js
507 ms
in.js
4 ms
openapi.js
685 ms
system.css
414 ms
ru.gif
136 ms
en.gif
136 ms
sep-vdot.gif
135 ms
logo.png
135 ms
thumb_thumb_mod_eco_owl_carousel_phoca_galler_min.png
799 ms
thumb_thumb_thumb_mod_ext_waterwheel_carousel1.png
292 ms
thumb_thumb_mod_eco_elasticstack_phoca_galler.png
693 ms
all.js
77 ms
widgets.js
47 ms
plusone.js
128 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
73 ms
upload.gif
507 ms
widget_like.php
570 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
475 ms
button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js
58 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
73 ms
71 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
104 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
149 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
55 ms
fastbutton
105 ms
follow_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html
36 ms
tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html
70 ms
info.json
101 ms
postmessageRelay
63 ms
rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA
7 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
25 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
2 ms
jot.html
9 ms
loader_nav3619114773373_3.js
122 ms
lite.css
241 ms
lite.js
488 ms
lang3_0.js
360 ms
widgets.css
361 ms
xdm.js
360 ms
al_like.js
369 ms
css-4b9e0.css
95 ms
like_widget.png
122 ms
eco-joom.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eco-joom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
eco-joom.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eco-joom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eco-joom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eco-joom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eco Joom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: