2.2 sec in total
442 ms
1.6 sec
134 ms
Visit ediacon.de now to see the best up-to-date Ediacon content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ediacon.de
Wir sind eine regional tätige Gesundheitsholding in Mitteldeutschland.
Visit ediacon.deWe analyzed Ediacon.de page load time and found that the first response time was 442 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
ediacon.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
58/100
10%
442 ms
303 ms
309 ms
308 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Ediacon.de, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (842 ms) belongs to the original domain Ediacon.de.
Page size can be reduced by 15.7 kB (3%)
497.8 kB
482.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ediacon.de main page is 497.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 460.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 261 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ediacon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ediacon.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
17
17
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ediacon. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
ediacon.de
442 ms
stylesheet_5672f6a5a4.css
303 ms
intro_style.css
309 ms
crossfade.js
308 ms
startseite_HG.jpg
208 ms
bg_top.gif
208 ms
logo_top.png
207 ms
startseite_2.jpg
317 ms
1.jpg
416 ms
2.jpg
414 ms
3.jpg
510 ms
4.jpg
520 ms
5.jpg
514 ms
startseite_3.jpg
842 ms
startseite_4.jpg
820 ms
startseite_5.jpg
826 ms
ga.js
29 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
ediacon.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ediacon.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ediacon.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ediacon.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ediacon.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ediacon.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ediacon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: