30.6 sec in total
807 ms
22.6 sec
7.2 sec
Welcome to egbule.com homepage info - get ready to check Egbule best content right away, or after learning these important things about egbule.com
Random Ravings/Musings of an Uber Geek
Visit egbule.comWe analyzed Egbule.com page load time and found that the first response time was 807 ms and then it took 29.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
egbule.com performance score
807 ms
248 ms
199 ms
206 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Egbule.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to 0.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) belongs to the original domain Egbule.com.
Page size can be reduced by 464.3 kB (24%)
1.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Egbule.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Egbule images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Egbule.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (55%)
71
32
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Egbule. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
egbule.com
807 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
248 ms
subscriptions.css
199 ms
widgets.css
206 ms
style.css
210 ms
sharing.css
208 ms
snazzy-archives.css
510 ms
jquery.js
645 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
479 ms
jquery.color.min.js
534 ms
utils.min.js
19984 ms
comment-reply.min.js
536 ms
jquery.scrollTo-min.js
829 ms
wp-locale.js
836 ms
spin.js
1148 ms
p2.js
1296 ms
snazzy-archives.js
837 ms
swfobject.js
875 ms
tumblog_frontend_styles.css
881 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
30 ms
gprofiles.js
83 ms
wpgroho.js
862 ms
sharing.js
970 ms
e-201614.js
32 ms
e-201614.js
53 ms
darkbadge_c.png
194 ms
ddba7a84bb51faf7cfdd9df9f904f235
265 ms
e454fdef2150504cf67b66bf76d97da8
265 ms
958887328d1b17299305475209b7028c
262 ms
578 ms
23bbb35e5ca02edba60a6b27fe1f8b70
501 ms
e454fdef2150504cf67b66bf76d97da8
467 ms
sidebar_back.gif
466 ms
wpid-quote1web_23.jpg
473 ms
wpid-quote2web5.jpg
477 ms
wpid-quote3web2.jpg
580 ms
wpid-quote4web4.jpg
774 ms
wpid-quote5web3.jpg
891 ms
wpid-quote7web2.jpg
956 ms
wpid-work3.jpg
1069 ms
wpid-quote8web3.jpg
1405 ms
wpid-quote10web3.jpg
1261 ms
wpid-beach-quote4.jpg
1290 ms
wpid-quote15web5.jpg
1124 ms
wpid-quote19web4.jpg
1386 ms
wpid-quote20web3.jpg
1420 ms
wpid-quote18web12.jpg
1277 ms
googleplus1.png
1313 ms
facebook.png
1326 ms
twitter.png
1357 ms
linkedin.png
1373 ms
more.png
1376 ms
wpid-3153567_orig.jpg
1504 ms
wpid-main-raw-t-10871-uoxHBBOIW6zCBiVZwp3Eorksk2BIEyk6.jpeg
1426 ms
wpid-698941369_1366770210.jpg
1434 ms
Mourinho.jpg
1532 ms
detective.jpg
1427 ms
loading.gif
1429 ms
g.gif
311 ms
hovercard.css
129 ms
services.css
139 ms
135 ms
style.css
192 ms
gprofiles.js
65 ms
wpgroho.js
199 ms
188 ms
form.js
190 ms
210 ms
124 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
87 ms
button-back.gif
69 ms
hovercard.css
46 ms
services.css
73 ms
googleplus-sign-in.js
9 ms
style-print.css
76 ms
egbule.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Egbule.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Egbule.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
egbule.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Egbule. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: