Tools & Wizards About Us
eiffel65.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

eiffel65.com

Eiffel 65

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

397 ms

eiffel65.com screenshot

About Website

Visit eiffel65.com now to see the best up-to-date Eiffel 65 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eiffel65.com

Welcome to the Eiffel 65 Official Website. Discover all the discography, gallery and tour dates from the Italian dance band.

Visit eiffel65.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eiffel65.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eiffel65.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eiffel65.com

1397 ms

menu-866aa62ff6c16fcab414a76f625ee345.css

110 ms

grid-responsive.css

174 ms

bootstrap.css

262 ms

master-7d3017cf7b30432fec1516b3448ce783.css

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Eiffel65.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to W.soundcloud.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Eiffel65.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (37%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eiffel65.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 37.0 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eiffel 65 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 599.5 kB

  • Original 873.8 kB
  • After minification 863.7 kB
  • After compression 274.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 599.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 514.2 kB

  • Original 801.9 kB
  • After minification 794.5 kB
  • After compression 287.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eiffel65.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 514.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (56%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eiffel 65. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eiffel65.com

eiffel65.com

1397 ms

menu-866aa62ff6c16fcab414a76f625ee345.css

menu-866aa62ff6c16fcab414a76f625ee345.css

110 ms

grid-responsive.css

grid-responsive.css

174 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

262 ms

master-7d3017cf7b30432fec1516b3448ce783.css

master-7d3017cf7b30432fec1516b3448ce783.css

188 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

174 ms

gantry-custom.css

gantry-custom.css

176 ms

modstyle.css

modstyle.css

197 ms

style.css

style.css

261 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

352 ms

core.js

core.js

274 ms

caption.js

caption.js

281 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

402 ms

browser-engines.js

browser-engines.js

346 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

346 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

369 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

369 ms

powertools-1.2.0.js

powertools-1.2.0.js

433 ms

slider.js

slider.js

434 ms

cookieconsent.1.0.2.min.js

cookieconsent.1.0.2.min.js

34 ms

ga.js

ga.js

51 ms

131 ms

noise.png

noise.png

94 ms

header2.jpg

header2.jpg

174 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

90 ms

Eiffel65_10_400.jpg

Eiffel65_10_400.jpg

268 ms

e65-g15.jpg

e65-g15.jpg

90 ms

e65-g9.jpg

e65-g9.jpg

174 ms

Eiffel651400.jpg

Eiffel651400.jpg

514 ms

Eiffel65_2_400.jpg

Eiffel65_2_400.jpg

268 ms

e65-g16.jpg

e65-g16.jpg

185 ms

Eiffel65_3_400.jpg

Eiffel65_3_400.jpg

473 ms

Eiffel65_4_400.jpg

Eiffel65_4_400.jpg

473 ms

Eiffel65-2_400.jpg

Eiffel65-2_400.jpg

474 ms

prev.png

prev.png

386 ms

next.png

next.png

386 ms

play.png

play.png

475 ms

pause.png

pause.png

474 ms

Yago.jpg

Yago.jpg

520 ms

vanilla.jpg

vanilla.jpg

605 ms

banner_4_Marzo.jpg

banner_4_Marzo.jpg

567 ms

class125.jpg

class125.jpg

614 ms

eiffel9.jpg

eiffel9.jpg

699 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

599 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

607 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

619 ms

itune.png

itune.png

685 ms

rss.png

rss.png

690 ms

livemarks.png

livemarks.png

693 ms

all.js

all.js

280 ms

videoseries

videoseries

91 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

663 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

interstate-0ab59479718c8235122cad6b16a66953d725c43a.css

interstate-0ab59479718c8235122cad6b16a66953d725c43a.css

232 ms

widget-0511d506.css

widget-0511d506.css

52 ms

widget-d9304090.js

widget-d9304090.js

172 ms

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

64 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

86 ms

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

43 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

43 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

83 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

84 ms

142 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

240 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

443 ms

logo-200x120-177df3dd.png

logo-200x120-177df3dd.png

28 ms

ga.js

ga.js

101 ms

multi-sounds-cd67be80.js

multi-sounds-cd67be80.js

54 ms

error-698b3c1d.js

error-698b3c1d.js

29 ms

beacon.js

beacon.js

19 ms

logo_grey-377f1b9e.png

logo_grey-377f1b9e.png

62 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

Accessibility Review

eiffel65.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

eiffel65.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eiffel65.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eiffel65.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eiffel65.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eiffel65.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eiffel 65. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: