6.6 sec in total
453 ms
5.8 sec
366 ms
Click here to check amazing Ejobgo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ejobgo.com
Visit ejobgo.comWe analyzed Ejobgo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 453 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ejobgo.com performance score
453 ms
2776 ms
375 ms
580 ms
984 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Ejobgo.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ejobgo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 252.2 kB (56%)
453.6 kB
201.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ejobgo.com main page is 453.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 173.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.0 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ejobgo needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 108.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 108.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ejobgo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (49%)
84
43
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ejobgo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ejobgo.com
453 ms
www.ejobgo.com
2776 ms
style.css
375 ms
xoops.js
580 ms
jquery-1.3.2.js
984 ms
Groject.ImageSwitch.js
870 ms
phpdate.js
212 ms
baseOutline.css
373 ms
head.css
629 ms
center.css
401 ms
foot.css
575 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
pic_top_009.jpg
177 ms
top_bg.jpg
381 ms
pic_bkbody_001.gif
196 ms
pic_navi_001.gif
226 ms
pic_navi_002.gif
197 ms
pic_icon_001.gif
228 ms
pic_bkgnavi_001.gif
389 ms
navi_head_001.gif
391 ms
navi_head_002.gif
387 ms
douhou.gif
443 ms
menu_bg.gif
444 ms
ejobgo_top_img0901.gif
752 ms
b01.gif
566 ms
b02.gif
587 ms
jmotto2-banner.gif
585 ms
b03.gif
662 ms
dtc_ejg_banner190_40.gif
663 ms
switch_banner1.jpg
919 ms
bnr_eshinbun.png
778 ms
bnr_myfarmer.png
781 ms
btn_img_001.gif
879 ms
btn_img_002.gif
877 ms
btn_img_003.gif
938 ms
ttl_list_003_2.gif
972 ms
ttl_list_003_3.gif
977 ms
new1.gif
1094 ms
pic_top_002.jpg
1317 ms
pic_top_003.jpg
1277 ms
pic_top_010.gif
1124 ms
ttl_list_001.gif
1163 ms
hyouji.gif
1169 ms
shain.gif
1309 ms
soku.gif
1310 ms
shikaku.gif
1355 ms
new2.gif
1363 ms
ttl_list_002.gif
1443 ms
collect
22 ms
pic_top_009.jpg
1575 ms
new1.gif
1311 ms
hyouji.gif
1324 ms
tanka.gif
1327 ms
mensetsu.gif
1340 ms
cho.gif
1259 ms
tairyo.gif
1302 ms
gaikoku.gif
1382 ms
nenrei.gif
1364 ms
pic_top_004.gif
1327 ms
pic_top_005.gif
1373 ms
pic_top_019.gif
1330 ms
new2.gif
1381 ms
pic_top_016.gif
1360 ms
pic_top_020.gif
1323 ms
pic_top_015.gif
1299 ms
top1.gif
1244 ms
rank_stay.gif
1306 ms
top2.gif
1358 ms
top3.gif
1286 ms
top4.gif
1311 ms
rank_down.gif
1283 ms
top5.gif
1234 ms
rank_up.gif
1295 ms
top6.gif
1355 ms
top7.gif
1266 ms
top8.gif
1223 ms
top9.gif
1243 ms
top10.gif
1247 ms
pic_top_013.gif
1178 ms
pic_top_014.gif
1212 ms
pic_top_021.gif
1213 ms
pic_top_023.gif
1238 ms
pic_bkwaku_002.gif
1265 ms
pic_top_022.gif
1271 ms
pic_top_024.gif
1186 ms
sinjin.gif
1221 ms
pic_top_17.gif
1167 ms
ejobgo.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
EUC-JP
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ejobgo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ejobgo.com main page’s claimed encoding is euc-jp. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
ejobgo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ejobgo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: