4.1 sec in total
110 ms
3.5 sec
520 ms
Click here to check amazing Ejwang content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ejwang.com
Visit ejwang.comWe analyzed Ejwang.com page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ejwang.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value13.4 s
2/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
110 ms
1557 ms
26 ms
103 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ejwang.com, 71% (53 requests) were made to Pcfx.net and 20% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Pcfx.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (51%)
3.9 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Ejwang.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ejwang needs image optimization as it can save up to 180.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 836.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 836.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 938.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ejwang.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 938.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (62%)
58
22
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ejwang. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ejwang.com
110 ms
pcfx.net
1557 ms
css
26 ms
layerslider.css
103 ms
css
45 ms
styles.css
49 ms
style.css
46 ms
font-awesome.min.css
90 ms
style.min.css
92 ms
stylesheet.min.css
313 ms
style_dynamic.css
104 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
102 ms
responsive.min.css
126 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
86 ms
js_composer.css
322 ms
custom_css.css
107 ms
greensock.js
183 ms
jquery.js
228 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
156 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
202 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
206 ms
PCFX_Web_logo.png
402 ms
Slide_front_Demo3.jpg
329 ms
Slide_09.jpg
319 ms
Slide_02.jpg
228 ms
Slide_01_darkgrey.jpg
274 ms
logo_white.png
385 ms
scripts.js
56 ms
qode-like.min.js
56 ms
plugins.js
163 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
162 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
164 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
184 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
211 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
189 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
221 ms
TweenLite.min.js
221 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
230 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
242 ms
js
97 ms
default_dynamic.js
242 ms
default.min.js
329 ms
custom_js.js
256 ms
comment-reply.min.js
289 ms
js_composer_front.js
279 ms
mainfeatures_bg2.jpg
343 ms
EasytoUse-100x100.png
313 ms
PerformanceScalability-100x100.png
318 ms
LiveFeed-100x100.png
326 ms
Compliance-100x100.png
335 ms
Client_Logos_Holder1.jpg
578 ms
grace-logo.png
386 ms
Client_Logos_Interchange.png
392 ms
Client_Logos_ChoiceForex.png
607 ms
Client_Logos_York.png
606 ms
Client_Logos_Holder.jpg
608 ms
PCFX_Web_logo_Footer2.png
341 ms
hHs22WBTTzMhSqc5uBBDKg.woff
20 ms
gMhvhm-nVj1086DvGgmzBz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
20 ms
WtcvfJHWXKxx4x0kuS1koT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
96 ms
nsLtvfQoT-rVwGTHHnkeJj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
31 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
352 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xOV5Bi3AvzDkLbMkkmS9JR4.woff
16 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xICtgNwyJYHzDAjKtI5LRRA.woff
17 ms
vQbQAx9WlNOTTgpOnfyPXQ.woff
28 ms
Li18TEFObx_yGdzKDoI_chsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
29 ms
ZKwULyCG95tk6mOqHQfRBBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
27 ms
cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
30 ms
rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
29 ms
STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
29 ms
WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
30 ms
QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
30 ms
Ji5epXNcpHu3r63lhS0cThsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
30 ms
jquery.form.min.js
359 ms
ajax-loader.gif
100 ms
ejwang.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ejwang.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ejwang.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ejwang.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ejwang.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ejwang.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ejwang. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: