8.7 sec in total
104 ms
1.9 sec
6.7 sec
Visit elementpack.pro now to see the best up-to-date Element Pack content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about elementpack.pro
Build outstanding landing pages on WordPress and boost your site authority on a massive scale! We are Empowering Elementor to perform beyond...
Visit elementpack.proWe analyzed Elementpack.pro page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
elementpack.pro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value5,140 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.967
2/100
15%
Value21.9 s
1/100
10%
104 ms
67 ms
124 ms
74 ms
90 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Elementpack.pro, 4% (3 requests) were made to Sbl.onfastspring.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Clarity.ms.
Page size can be reduced by 618.4 kB (23%)
2.6 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Elementpack.pro main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 535.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 535.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Element Pack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elementpack.pro has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (61%)
64
25
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Element Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.elementpack.pro
104 ms
bdt-uikit.css
67 ms
ep-helper.css
124 ms
bdt-template-manager-public.css
74 ms
style.css
90 ms
default-fonts.css
71 ms
style.css
94 ms
frontend.min.css
131 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
132 ms
swiper.min.css
135 ms
ep-styles.css
167 ms
jquery.min.js
135 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
203 ms
www.elementpack.pro
481 ms
fastspring-builder.min.js
40 ms
messenger.js
43 ms
bdt-widget-filter.css
460 ms
style.css
179 ms
bdt-template-manager-public.js
164 ms
bdt-uikit.min.js
441 ms
theme.js
472 ms
comment-reply.min.js
472 ms
widget-filter.js
471 ms
countUp.min.js
460 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
718 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
717 ms
waypoints.min.js
720 ms
core.min.js
718 ms
frontend.min.js
717 ms
ep-scripts.js
718 ms
pricing-plan.js
981 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
56 ms
gtm.js
536 ms
fbt.js
540 ms
A1342638-cd3e-4e6d-9fb4-b12e91d701d81.js
535 ms
fbevents.js
293 ms
dw5mju0vvs
1341 ms
element-pack-pro-logo.svg
391 ms
products_menu_bg.svg
483 ms
circular-text-1.svg
394 ms
elementor-panel.png
393 ms
no-coding-image.png
396 ms
all-in-all-features-slide-ep.png
397 ms
empowering-desing.png
490 ms
bg-1.jpg
477 ms
bg-2.jpg
479 ms
bg-3.jpg
481 ms
bg-4.jpg
485 ms
kendold2022-300x300.jpg
484 ms
uzoamaka_new-300x300.png
488 ms
campru-300x300.jpg
486 ms
testimonial-300x300.png
489 ms
david_james-300x300.jpg
490 ms
kypros-300x300.jpg
491 ms
aaacikbas-300x300.jpg
572 ms
nikojulius-300x300.jpg
494 ms
element-pack-pro-logo.svg
492 ms
money-transfer-logo-bdt.svg
495 ms
spin.svg
61 ms
builder
717 ms
fastspring.css
62 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
534 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
394 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
522 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
450 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
557 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
632 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf
509 ms
js
249 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjQ.ttf
630 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjQ.ttf
808 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjQ.ttf
390 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjQ.ttf
389 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf
391 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjQ.ttf
388 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjQ.ttf
387 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjQ.ttf
383 ms
element-pack.ttf
380 ms
dw5mju0vvs
692 ms
main.js
52 ms
clarity.js
173 ms
elementpack.pro accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
elementpack.pro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
elementpack.pro SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elementpack.pro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elementpack.pro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
elementpack.pro
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Element Pack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: