50.9 sec in total
485 ms
37.2 sec
13.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Email Checker content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about email-checker.com
Emailable is an email checker SaaS designed for bulk validation. Say goodbye to crowded, inaccurate email lists.
Visit email-checker.comWe analyzed Email-checker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 485 ms and then it took 50.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
email-checker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.154
75/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
485 ms
209 ms
616 ms
4917 ms
699 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Email-checker.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Api.emailverifyapp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Email-checker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (67%)
2.6 MB
831.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Email-checker.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Email Checker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 907.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 907.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 729.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Email-checker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 729.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (25%)
59
44
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Email Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
email-checker.com
485 ms
www.email-checker.com
209 ms
www.email-checker.com
616 ms
webfont.js
4917 ms
autoptimize_932c6cc9a3ca89030371c8f02d760fc6.css
699 ms
dashicons.min.css
4305 ms
autoptimize_9ce24f5ca82bce8cf55c45a4578c3c4c.js
5372 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1055 ms
analytics.js
1010 ms
css
2032 ms
collect
6490 ms
Email-Checker-Logo-Large-PNG-1.png
2587 ms
index_demo1.html
3282 ms
Email-Checker-Screen-01.png
2089 ms
wysada-grey.png
2046 ms
windstar-grey.png
2047 ms
wallstreetenglish-grey.png
2913 ms
snapdeal-grey.png
2912 ms
shi-grey.png
2909 ms
seagate-grey.png
2899 ms
onoff-grey.png
4147 ms
nexercise-grey.png
4114 ms
netlotto-grey.png
4327 ms
naranga-grey.png
2943 ms
mvf-grey.png
3064 ms
movenpick-grey.png
13697 ms
moneyexpert-grey.png
14029 ms
Mcafee-grey.png
14027 ms
matrix-grey.png
14028 ms
linknet-grey.png
14028 ms
lechateau-grey.png
14029 ms
indiamart-grey.png
14040 ms
fibre2fashion-grey.png
15799 ms
EE-grey.png
15800 ms
crius-grey.png
15799 ms
box-grey.png
15798 ms
xibo-grey.png
15798 ms
yandex-grey.png
15798 ms
yahoo-grey.png
16479 ms
webdunia-grey.png
16691 ms
sify-grey.png
16478 ms
rediff-grey.png
16630 ms
itimes-grey.png
16418 ms
incom-grey.png
16417 ms
hotmail-grey.png
19181 ms
goibibo-grey.png
19181 ms
Gmail-grey.png
19180 ms
AOL-grey.png
19158 ms
amail-grey.png
17265 ms
New-Yahoo-logo_300x110.jpg
17263 ms
Twitter-Email-Checker.jpg
17324 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13771 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
16477 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
17273 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
17274 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
17273 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
17226 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
17807 ms
jquery.min.js
804 ms
jquery.emailChecker.1.0.0.min.js
1839 ms
api.js
13964 ms
css
331 ms
default.css
11510 ms
responsive.css
11521 ms
jquery.emailChecker.min.css
11521 ms
tracking.js
16643 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
17036 ms
rum-beacon-min.js
13973 ms
ajax-loader.gif
7277 ms
recaptcha__en.js
3405 ms
ult-silk.woff
2210 ms
ult-silk.woff
2157 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
694 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
644 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
642 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
696 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
820 ms
email-checker.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
email-checker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
email-checker.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Email-checker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Email-checker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
email-checker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Email Checker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: