Tools & Wizards About Us
emailframe.work screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

emailframe.work

Responsive HTML Email Framework

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

432 ms

Resources Loaded

918 ms

Page Rendered

877 ms

emailframe.work screenshot

About Website

Visit emailframe.work now to see the best up-to-date Email Frame content for Algeria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emailframe.work

The Email Framework for creating responsive HTML emails templates supported on over 60+ emails clients. Code your email templates confidently today.

Visit emailframe.work

Key Findings

We analyzed Emailframe.work page load time and found that the first response time was 432 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emailframe.work performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emailframe.work

432 ms

style.css

177 ms

lemonade.css

181 ms

css

25 ms

css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Emailframe.work, 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (432 ms) belongs to the original domain Emailframe.work.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 344.5 kB (83%)

Content Size

417.4 kB

After Optimization

72.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emailframe.work main page is 417.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 279.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 266.6 kB

  • Original 279.5 kB
  • After minification 273.0 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 266.6 kB or 95% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Email Frame needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 80.2 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 34.6 kB
  • After minification 32.3 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emailframe.work needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (69%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Email Frame. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emailframe.work

emailframe.work

432 ms

style.css

style.css

177 ms

lemonade.css

lemonade.css

181 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

36 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

6 ms

prism.css

prism.css

183 ms

468x60_var1.jpg

468x60_var1.jpg

309 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

9 ms

scroll.js

scroll.js

130 ms

app.js

app.js

130 ms

prism.js

prism.js

130 ms

embed.js

embed.js

224 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

116 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

35 ms

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

36 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

35 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

159 ms

collect

collect

63 ms

lounge.load.85ba7336856f5be9db0e468752c2dad5.js

lounge.load.85ba7336856f5be9db0e468752c2dad5.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

emailframe.work accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

emailframe.work best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emailframe.work SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emailframe.work can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Emailframe.work main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emailframe.work

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Email Frame. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: