5.8 sec in total
582 ms
4.3 sec
898 ms
Welcome to empro.com homepage info - get ready to check Empro best content right away, or after learning these important things about empro.com
Web development and cyber security. Enjoy the benefits of experience and sound Internet know-how. We help you create and secure your digital assets.
Visit empro.comWe analyzed Empro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 582 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
empro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value5,280 ms
0/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
582 ms
244 ms
335 ms
358 ms
341 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Empro.com, 14% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Empro.com.
Page size can be reduced by 82.2 kB (14%)
588.7 kB
506.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Empro.com main page is 588.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 230.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Empro needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Empro.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (73%)
79
21
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Empro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
empro.com
582 ms
x10ZcKns9XrrUl_dyW3kKbDzYcc.js
244 ms
content.css
335 ms
calendar-jos.css
358 ms
s5_tab_show.css
341 ms
jquery.min.js
468 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
361 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
566 ms
caption.js
629 ms
bootstrap.min.js
686 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
662 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
647 ms
jquery-ui-addons.js
866 ms
core.js
921 ms
keepalive.js
951 ms
mootools-core.js
1071 ms
mootools-more.js
683 ms
punycode.js
1004 ms
validate.js
1041 ms
calendar.js
1188 ms
calendar-setup.js
1233 ms
s5_tab_show.js
1259 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
1012 ms
s5box.css
1312 ms
s5_register.css
1343 ms
bootstrap-default-min.css
1390 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
1509 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1544 ms
ionicons.min.css
1566 ms
css
32 ms
s5_flex_menu-min.js
1326 ms
s5_flex_menu.css
1338 ms
system.css
1359 ms
general.css
1618 ms
template_default.css
1664 ms
template.css
1683 ms
com_content.css
1798 ms
css
43 ms
css
50 ms
editor.css
1871 ms
thirdparty.css
1655 ms
multibox.css
1299 ms
ajax.css
1608 ms
s5_responsive_bars-min.css
1328 ms
s5_responsive_hide_classes-min.css
1623 ms
s5_responsive.css
1546 ms
custom.css
1573 ms
s5_info_slide-min.css
1571 ms
overlay.js
1574 ms
multibox.js
1581 ms
s5_font_adjuster-min.js
1314 ms
s5_info_slide-min.js
1262 ms
scrollReveal-min.js
1156 ms
s5_responsive_mobile_bar-min.js
1128 ms
email-decode.min.js
1093 ms
s5_box_hide_div.js
1345 ms
Q5aBWXwHe-nV2fWaUocvwKLNwFM.js
1342 ms
system.css
878 ms
hotjar-745593.js
146 ms
analytics.js
142 ms
mainpageback.png
423 ms
search_light.png
387 ms
dark_logo.png
349 ms
menu_light.png
116 ms
s5_logo.png
383 ms
phone2.gif
383 ms
email2a.gif
116 ms
social-icons-2019-facebook.png
203 ms
social-icons-2019-twitter.png
264 ms
social-icons-2019-linkedin.png
290 ms
social-icons-2019-yelp.png
588 ms
social-icons-2019-instagram.png
655 ms
10-500x500.png
895 ms
s5_shadow.png
686 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
245 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
190 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
184 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
182 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
179 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
206 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
179 ms
modules.8203b45d0468dcab4b64.js
181 ms
collect
78 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
128 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
120 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
122 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
119 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
119 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
121 ms
ionicons.ttf
196 ms
border1.png
498 ms
border2.png
491 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
57 ms
visit-data
417 ms
empro.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
empro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
empro.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Empro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Empro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
empro.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Empro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: