7.3 sec in total
52 ms
5.7 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Enterpriseefficiency content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about enterpriseefficiency.com
Power More is a news site offering information and analysis on technology, business, and gadget-geek culture, from the Dell Inc. Learn how IT thought leadership can help drive better business decision...
Visit enterpriseefficiency.comWe analyzed Enterpriseefficiency.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
enterpriseefficiency.com performance score
52 ms
932 ms
235 ms
844 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Enterpriseefficiency.com, 34% (25 requests) were made to Powermore.dell.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to N.mplxtms.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Powermore.dell.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (34%)
3.9 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Enterpriseefficiency.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enterpriseefficiency images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enterpriseefficiency.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 221.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (57%)
65
28
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enterpriseefficiency. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
enterpriseefficiency.com
52 ms
www.enterpriseefficiency.com
932 ms
techpageone.dell.com
235 ms
powermore.dell.com
844 ms
vendor.min.css
33 ms
main.min.css
68 ms
client.js
444 ms
jquery.js
101 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
186 ms
social-actions.js
190 ms
Bootstrap.js
271 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
187 ms
addthis_widget.js
427 ms
all.min.js
183 ms
MasterTMS.min.js
337 ms
column-border-bg.png
193 ms
logo-home.png
175 ms
serverComponent.php
109 ms
museosansfordell-regular-webfont.woff
102 ms
museosansfordell-bold-webfont.woff
100 ms
icomoon.woff
94 ms
tags
404 ms
rd
117 ms
admin-ajax.php
1112 ms
id
760 ms
sdk.js
1168 ms
SkratchTV-Image-2048x764.jpg
969 ms
SkratchTV-Image-1280x946.jpg
664 ms
e-recycling-1280x946.jpg
743 ms
Workplace-IOT-devices-1280x946.jpg
662 ms
Keeping-CIO-Relevant-1280x946.jpg
1149 ms
kid3000-640x853.jpg
995 ms
World-Cup-2014_3000-640x853.jpeg
1321 ms
TGen-1280x946.jpg
1329 ms
shopping3000-1280x946.jpg
1331 ms
IoT-Retail-1280x946.jpg
1478 ms
Tech-Issues-President-1280x946.jpg
1448 ms
14f5abfe2d0c71d7012deccb40409dae.js
614 ms
12309-73735-3840-0
1182 ms
tags
1177 ms
universal_conditional_mct_us_powermore.html
1016 ms
universal_tpo.html
1009 ms
iframe_api
901 ms
bk-coretag.js
829 ms
tags
770 ms
tJyCrLAu.min.js
853 ms
s36655018455348
452 ms
17352
729 ms
504 ms
xd_arbiter.php
324 ms
25799-187287-3840-0
128 ms
match
675 ms
www-widgetapi.js
445 ms
tags
117 ms
ip.json
387 ms
pixel
374 ms
23084
135 ms
290 ms
138 ms
17441
99 ms
pixel
63 ms
adsct
136 ms
js
38 ms
l
43 ms
i.js
82 ms
match
234 ms
nr-885.min.js
171 ms
dest5.html
111 ms
tags
24 ms
xd_arbiter.php
47 ms
f1bc219235
164 ms
js
37 ms
img
34 ms
enterpriseefficiency.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enterpriseefficiency.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Enterpriseefficiency.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
enterpriseefficiency.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enterpriseefficiency. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: